The Instigator
anonymouse
Con (against)
Losing
6 Points
The Contender
miastech
Pro (for)
Winning
7 Points

Resolved: Erin Paeng or die

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/28/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 887 times Debate No: 14987
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (5)

 

anonymouse

Con

I stand in firm negation of the resolution: Erin Paeng or die. I'd much rather die.
miastech

Pro

I stand in firm affirmation of the resolution because no.
Debate Round No. 1
anonymouse

Con

I would like to thank my opponent for being here and accepting my debate.

I will now move into my contentions.

Before I start, I need to provide some definitions to clarify things.

The definition of Erin Paeng, as taken from urban dictionary, is a butt ugly and very stupid person.

The word "or" implies that I am given an ultimatum; I must choose between Erin Paeng, or die.

Die, in strictly denotational terms, is bad. Relative to the alternative given, Erin Paeng, it is actually not that bad.

I will now provide my first contention.

The choice is ours to make, do we choose Erin Paeng or death? As stated in my definition, we can reframe the question to butt-ugly and very stupid person, or death. To any person with an ounce of common sense, death is much more preferable.

My resolutional analysis will now be provided.
I am now writing my R.A.

This resolution is vague and unclear, and as first speaker I am obligated to provide an insight as to how the vagueness should be interpreted.
Erin Paeng, or death? What does it mean to choose Erin Paeng over death? What would Erin Paeng do? Or in other words, what would Erin do for the chooser?

My criterion for this is trolling. To successfully win this debate, the arguer must devoid from any logical argument and instead reason with logic that only reasonable people find unreasonable because of troll logic which is reasonable to unreasonable reason.
miastech

Pro

In a america i say addo
Debate Round No. 2
anonymouse

Con

anonymouse forfeited this round.
miastech

Pro

miastech forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
anonymouse

Con

anonymouse forfeited this round.
miastech

Pro

miastech forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
anonymouse

Con

Yeah.. Iw in
miastech

Pro

miastech forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Rinexe 5 years ago
Rinexe
As you said in my debate:
Pro wins. Con did not extend her "because no" argument.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by OtakuJordan 3 years ago
OtakuJordan
anonymousemiastechTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Troll debate.
Vote Placed by funwiththoughts 3 years ago
funwiththoughts
anonymousemiastechTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: No arguments presented, so there shouldn't be a victor. Also, Con failed to specify that this was a troll debate.
Vote Placed by The_Master_Riddler 3 years ago
The_Master_Riddler
anonymousemiastechTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Meh. I have to give this one to pro. Spelling and Grammar to Pro for creating such a vague topic. Winning from a forfeit usually requires one person to actually give arguments. Because no arguments were given, there was almost no reason to debate. Also, creating a troll debate and not recognizing it as such until the second round, creating an unclear resolution, all of this goes under bad conduct. Since con was first, she did not meet the BOP, therefore she loses args.
Vote Placed by bsh1 3 years ago
bsh1
anonymousemiastechTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by BangBang-Coconut 5 years ago
BangBang-Coconut
anonymousemiastechTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: This was an idiotic debate =-=