The Instigator
kcirrone
Pro (for)
Losing
10 Points
The Contender
Logical-Master
Con (against)
Winning
107 Points

Resolved: I'm HOT!!!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/8/2008 Category: Sports
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,750 times Debate No: 4368
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (9)
Votes (33)

 

kcirrone

Pro

I'm Hot....duh

Contentions:

1) I'm Hot. I'm blonde, have blue eyes, have a slender athletic build, i.e. basketball player. I have a 6 pack, and overall muscular, but not too muscular. Ladies love me.

I'm Hot, get it?
Logical-Master

Con

PRO's CASE.

1) I'm blonde.
2) I have blue eyes.
3) I have a slender athletic build (like a basketball player)
4) I have a six pack
5) I am overall muscular.
6) Ladies love me.
7) Therefore, I'm hot.

Now upon noticing this syllogism, I cannot help but notice that there a few leaps in logic.

Firstly, PRO never provides any evidence to confirm any of these so-called facts. For all we know, he could be a hideous beast who dwells in his parents' basement. PRO could have EASILY posted a pic to confirm his appearance. Upon doing so, he may very well obtain the admiration and adulation of the "ladies" of this website. Indeed, ladies would love him here as well, yet oddly enough, he refuses to post a simple picture.

Second, even if we were to assume that all of that is true, that wouldn't lead us to the conclusion that PRO was "hot." After all, he could have all of that, but if his facial appearance (which he makes no mention or description of were to look something like this: http://i130.photobucket.com..., most would not think of him as hot, despite his body, eye color and hair color. He'd probably have to wear a mask no matter where he went, for I suspect that most believe that the above face is a face that not even a mother could love.

Third, don't you think of it as odd that he makes no mention of how his face looks. Very strange indeed. He described everything BUT his face (which, often times, is the most important description). What does my humble (*sarcasm*) opponent have to hide from the world, much less a debating community where we debate things and such?

Fourth, the ladies he refers to could very well be pragma lovers, and simply "love" my opponent for his money or possessions rather than his body.

Thus, I believe I've shown that his premises are inadequate in proving whether or not he is hot. Furthermore, since I've shown how he has refused to provide even the most basic evidence (such a photo) and information (he left out the matter of his facial structure) to confirm his claim, this would likely mean that he is indeed presenting you with false information (as many do on dating websites when it comes to this) rather than the truth.

Conclusion: Thus, it is very much likely (given the evidence) that my opponent is not hot.

To add: If we are to take the resolution in any other way, then my opponent has failed to show that he finds his surrounding temperature unbearable. Given that is it currently 80 degrees in Rockville Centre New York, this would suggest that it wasn't hot, thus making it unlikely that my opponent is hot. In fact, a credible scientist concurs with the notion that 80 degree air is warm rather than hot ( http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov... ).
Debate Round No. 1
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by Wayne 8 years ago
Wayne
oh haha, this is so funny, thanks for the good laugh
Posted by ekta2gupta 9 years ago
ekta2gupta
its realy a funny debate but i realy realy appreciate con for so nicely and so logically proving his opponent wrong.. i loved the way you did that...
my vote for you
Posted by SweetBags 9 years ago
SweetBags
nice logical, well done
con rebutted all of pros points quite well, so i vote CON
Posted by Undeniable-Love 9 years ago
Undeniable-Love
Umm...Okay...interesting.
Posted by DrAlexander 9 years ago
DrAlexander
Oh yeah,

Nice job Logical!

:DD...poor guy (uglypeople.com)
Posted by DrAlexander 9 years ago
DrAlexander
Not necessarily true, one could look extremely beautiful and evil so they want people to get jealous, ergo they brag about their apperance.
Posted by BeatTheDevil89 9 years ago
BeatTheDevil89
People who are actually good looking and have grounds to brag about stuff usually don't because they have the self confidence to not need to anounce it to the world. So Pro loses by default.
Posted by kcirrone 9 years ago
kcirrone
HAHA, lol, idc, I did this 1 round debate to make laughs.

Say w/e u want ^^
Posted by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
Hmm, it would seem I'm at a conundrum as I cannot think of rebuttal at the moment without being "really mean."
33 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Tatarize 8 years ago
Tatarize
kcirroneLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by marin24 8 years ago
marin24
kcirroneLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Wayne 8 years ago
Wayne
kcirroneLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
kcirroneLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by SweetBags 9 years ago
SweetBags
kcirroneLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by padfo0t 9 years ago
padfo0t
kcirroneLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Xera 9 years ago
Xera
kcirroneLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Jamcke 9 years ago
Jamcke
kcirroneLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by austinrsell 9 years ago
austinrsell
kcirroneLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by ally93 9 years ago
ally93
kcirroneLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03