The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Resolved: Jupiter is not a Planet.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/21/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,582 times Debate No: 77453
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (27)
Votes (1)




This debate is impossible to accept.

THIS IS A SERIOUS DEBATE In honnor of New Horrizon coming close to Pluto I've decided to do another space debate.

First Round is Terms and defintions by Pro, Acceptance by Con.
Second Round is Constructive Arguments, NO REBUTTALS
!Third Round is Rebuttals.
Forth Round is Rebuttals and conclusion.
No Semantics, the definitions provided are what is to be used in this debate.
No Trolling.
No K's.
If any of the above rules are violated, all 7 points go to the opposition.

The following User(s) are banned from voting on this debate.
Zarrotte (

Thedefinition ofplanetset inPraguein 2006 by theInternational Astronomical Union(IAU) states that, in theSolar System, aplanetis acelestial bodywhich:

is in orbit around the Sun,
has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium(a nearly round shape), and
has "cleared the neighbourhood" around its orbit. (

Jupiter- Pictured bellow.
s://; alt="An image of Jupiter taken by New Horizons." />


There seem to have been a mistake. please do not vote on this debate.
Debate Round No. 1


I accept the tie.
Debate Round No. 2
Debate Round No. 3
Debate Round No. 4
27 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by brianjustin3709 2 years ago
The rules were violated so techinally Con has to win
Posted by TheJuniorVarsityNovice 2 years ago
On second thought, I'll wait to accept until you comment or PM me
Posted by TheJuniorVarsityNovice 2 years ago
Lol, why is Zaratte banned from voting on this debate?
Posted by TheJuniorVarsityNovice 2 years ago
XD I apologize but I can't help but laugh at the situation. This is probably the one debate you have where you didn't put that acceptance without permission is an auto forfeit Hahah.....don't worry, I'll make this a good round, I won't disappoint.
Posted by TheJuniorVarsityNovice 2 years ago
ohh sht, I'm sorry...well I guess we're kinda stuck with this now so what other choice do we have but to finish it...I'm going to post my acceptance round
Posted by lannan13 2 years ago
Dude you weren't suppose to accept this.
Posted by Discipulus_Didicit 2 years ago
Yes, it may be a trap. A trap like the TROJAN horse perhaps?!?! Hmmmmm???


Anyone? no?

Alright then. Carry on.
Posted by Atheist-Independent 2 years ago
Me too, I don't want to accept in case I run into a trap XD
Posted by BennyW 2 years ago
I just want to see the arguments on this.
Posted by Gordontrek 2 years ago
I'll take it if you'll have me.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by tejretics 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Sadly, the debate was tied . . . I was curious to know how Pro would argue without semantics . . . because "semantics" is just the science of language . . .