Resolved: Public high school students in the United States ought be required to pass standardize
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
| Started: | 9/3/2009 | Category: | Education |
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 1,320 times | Debate No: | 9405 |
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (3)
Votes (5)
|
Resolved: Public high school students in the United States ought not be required to pass standardized exit exams to graduate.
----------------- I will be taking CON in this debate and in doing so will let PRO go first. ---------------- I reserve the right to clarify the topic should I deem it necessary. No semantics guys, just a straightforward debate on what is the LD topic this month. I will also answer any lingering questions someone might have in the comments. -------------- Good luck to who ever accepts this debate! ------------- My opponent may propose definitions.
Sorry, I got caught by the double negative. Con not requiring tests is Pro tests, which is what I would argue. I apologize for spiking your debate. I suggest you repost it so you'll get a proper advocate of not testing students. |
![]() |
|
This debate has been voided. Please look here for the new one: http://www.debate.org...
Debate was voided. |
![]() |
|
ilovgoogle forfeited this round.
Debate was voided. |
![]() |
|
Debate was voided. R.I.P. |
![]() |
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by quarterexchange 2 years ago
| ilovgoogle | RoyLatham | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Vote Placed by m93samman 2 years ago
| ilovgoogle | RoyLatham | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 0 |
Vote Placed by oceanix 3 years ago
| ilovgoogle | RoyLatham | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 3 years ago
| ilovgoogle | RoyLatham | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by ilovgoogle 3 years ago
| ilovgoogle | RoyLatham | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
















What exactly do you mean by this? Are you saying No Framework, Interp, whatever? and I also assume by the second art that you would rather not see some random A Priori Just thrown out there?
I may accept this but I want t know what that phrase means first