Resolved:The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was an act of Terrorism.
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
| Started: | 7/13/2012 | Category: | Economics |
| Updated: | 9 months ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 487 times | Debate No: | 24709 |
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (9)
Votes (0)
|
No Semantics.
R1 Con may post opening shoots but must agree to my terms. R5 no new arguments will be made. -"...bombing of" is talking about the atomic bombs terrorism[ ter-uh-riz-uh m ] noun 1.�the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.
I agree to the Pro's terms. I shall be taking the role of the Contender for this debate. I shall allow you to post your arguments, thus starting the debate. |
![]() |
|
westernmarch forfeited this round.
|
![]() |
|
Sorry. I have been busy.
For me to win I have to prove America's intent to scare the Japanese into surrendering. It is clear that America wanted Japan to surrender. By nuking the two cities, America spread fear into the Japanese population. The Potsdam declaration is further proof that the bombings was terrorism. WAS HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI A TACTICAL LOCATION? Both cities were picked for the relatively untouched Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They were chosen for population. Sorry for the forfeiture. If I could can I post my sources in the comments later? I cant now. Dagolas forfeited this round. |
![]() |
|
Dagolas forfeited this round. |
![]() |
|
westernmarch forfeited this round.
They were at war. By that logic, each time someone died it was terrorism. |
![]() |
No votes have been placed for this debate.














The US Department of Defense defines it thus: "the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological." http://www.terrorism-research.com...