The Instigator
DebateStorm
Pro (for)
Tied
3 Points
The Contender
Baconwich
Con (against)
Tied
3 Points

Resolved: The methods which PETA employs are hazardous to the well-being of society

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/9/2010 Category: Society
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,195 times Debate No: 11144
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (7)
Votes (3)

 

DebateStorm

Pro

Thank you to whomever accepts this debate!
Baconwich

Con

PETA does not use hazardous methods to attain their goals.
Debate Round No. 1
DebateStorm

Pro

DebateStorm forfeited this round.
Baconwich

Con

Baconwich forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
DebateStorm

Pro

DebateStorm forfeited this round.
Baconwich

Con

Baconwich forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
DebateStorm

Pro

DebateStorm forfeited this round.
Baconwich

Con

Baconwich forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by RaeTulo 7 years ago
RaeTulo
The pro should have made clear arguments as to HOW PETA's methods are hazardous.

"A rat is a pig, and a dog is a boy"
Peta has set animals on a higher priority than animals, as was shown in New Orleans
when the streets were flooded and the people were treading water to save their lives, if there was a dog or cat down the street, PETA saved the animal's life first. They find it perfectly acceptable to surrender human life to save that of an animals.
Posted by Korashk 7 years ago
Korashk
This 'debate' doesn't deserve a winner in my opinion.
Posted by RoyLatham 7 years ago
RoyLatham
No arguments were made by either side. Pro had the burden of proof, so it goes to Con.
Posted by DebateStorm 7 years ago
DebateStorm
To respond to Koopin's comment, I have always observed PETA employees from a far distance (via the internet) and I have heard many a news story about an attack by PETA. But my debate is about PETA as a whole, because the actions of the PETA employees are warranted by the executives representing PETA itself.
Posted by Koopin 7 years ago
Koopin
oh, I think you meant employees
Posted by Koopin 7 years ago
Koopin
No one can refute this unless they say that the members of peta are hazardous instead of what peta stands for.
Posted by Sniperjake1994 7 years ago
Sniperjake1994
Well of course, they even advocate blowing up animal factories. I cannot believe my favorite music band, Rise Against, supports with this!
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Sniperjake1994 7 years ago
Sniperjake1994
DebateStormBaconwichTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Vote Placed by Korashk 7 years ago
Korashk
DebateStormBaconwichTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 7 years ago
RoyLatham
DebateStormBaconwichTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03