The Instigator
Masterdebater12345
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Zaradi
Pro (for)
Winning
8 Points

Resolved: United States should suspend all assistance to Pakistan

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Zaradi
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/27/2012 Category: Politics
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,086 times Debate No: 22348
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (13)
Votes (2)

 

Masterdebater12345

Con

Round 1- Acceptance
Round 2- Argument Presentation
Round 3- Rebuttle
Round 4- Summary
Zaradi

Pro

I accept your challenge
like your mom accepted my pen1s:
lustfully and whole-heartedly,
intending to devour it whole.
Debate Round No. 1
Masterdebater12345

Con

Masterdebater12345 forfeited this round.
Zaradi

Pro

As my opponent forfeited, it still falls on me to post a case. Thus, my case is in the following link.
https://docs.google.com...#

Now, lemme take a moment to clarify on how my case interacts with the resolution.

By providing assitance to Pakistan, we are thereby reducing the amount of suffering in Pakistan. As my case clearly shows, a reduction in the amount of suffering corrolates with the loss of the value of life. In order to return life's value, we must suspend all assistance to Pakistan.

Therefore, I urge a pro vote.
Debate Round No. 2
Masterdebater12345

Con

Masterdebater12345 forfeited this round.
Zaradi

Pro

......of couse this happens when I take a PF debate.
Silly PFers.
Debate Round No. 3
Masterdebater12345

Con

Masterdebater12345 forfeited this round.
Zaradi

Pro

Well that was dissapointing.
Debate Round No. 4
13 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by thett3 5 years ago
thett3
Its just trolling!
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
Ew. Actually do PF? Fvck no xD
Posted by thett3 5 years ago
thett3
please please please do PF for a tournament and run that then tell me all about it
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
It is xD
Posted by thett3 5 years ago
thett3
Haha you're right XD

but you have to admit its a funny response
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
Haha xD That would be a funny response to run. But in front of a lay judge, the only words that she would hear is "he has a better case than I do" and "I concede" so that wouldn't be such a good idea xD

But ALSO! I would respond that my argument isn't about maximizing the suffering in the world, but rather letting the suffering of the world flow naturally, with us interfeering as little as possible, preferably not at all. So it wouldn't actually be responsive :P

See what I mean?
Posted by thett3 5 years ago
thett3
My response: "I concede to my opponents argument that suffering is good. He has a better constructed and more compelling case than I do, therefore he logically cares more for this activity than I do, and would be more upset to lose. So in order to maximize ssuffering in this round, you need to vote for me" ^.^ that would be such an epic round to do infront of a mommy judge...
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
Oh I will. I love this case :D it's just fvcking genius because no one ever knows how to respond to it.
Posted by thett3 5 years ago
thett3
This is dissapointing. Please use this against the other "debaters" that spam this resolution :)
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
I just did. You mad, bro?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Xerge 5 years ago
Xerge
Masterdebater12345ZaradiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit...
Vote Placed by Contra 5 years ago
Contra
Masterdebater12345ZaradiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: CON forfeited and did not construct any argument.