Resolved: United States should suspend all assistance to Pakistan
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Zaradi
| Started: | 3/27/2012 | Category: | Politics |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 440 times | Debate No: | 22348 |
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (13)
Votes (2)
 Con Round 2- Argument Presentation Round 3- Rebuttle Round 4- Summary  Pro I accept your challenge like your mom accepted my pen1s: lustfully and whole-heartedly, intending to devour it whole. |
 |
|
Con Masterdebater12345 forfeited this round.
Pro As my opponent forfeited, it still falls on me to post a case. Thus, my case is in the following link. https://docs.google.com...# Now, lemme take a moment to clarify on how my case interacts with the resolution. By providing assitance to Pakistan, we are thereby reducing the amount of suffering in Pakistan. As my case clearly shows, a reduction in the amount of suffering corrolates with the loss of the value of life. In order to return life's value, we must suspend all assistance to Pakistan. Therefore, I urge a pro vote. |
 |
|
Con Masterdebater12345 forfeited this round.
|
 |
|
Con Masterdebater12345 forfeited this round.
|
 |
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Xerge 1 year ago
| Masterdebater12345 | Zaradi | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit...
Vote Placed by Contra 1 year ago
| Masterdebater12345 | Zaradi | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: CON forfeited and did not construct any argument.
but you have to admit its a funny response
But ALSO! I would respond that my argument isn't about maximizing the suffering in the world, but rather letting the suffering of the world flow naturally, with us interfeering as little as possible, preferably not at all. So it wouldn't actually be responsive :P
See what I mean?