The Instigator
Herecomesthedoge
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
fazz
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

Road kill is better than art

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
fazz
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/19/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 537 times Debate No: 44232
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

Herecomesthedoge

Pro

This is the round of acceptance.

I think road kill is better because its like a tattoo on the road and also rednecks and McDonald's can eat it.
fazz

Con

I accept. But if you cannot what is good and bad art then.. it's a circular argument?

Bring it on!
Debate Round No. 1
Herecomesthedoge

Pro

Roadkill is better because it is easier to create. You can just run an animal over and then you got roadkill. With art you have to spend years making it. It also teaches you the meaning of death and how easy it is to die. roadkill also teaches you about the anatomy of an animal as you can see the brains and guts fall out of it.
fazz

Con

Argument:

Your argument is unfounded since you fail to provide ground rules for said debate..

Is roadkill better? a) as a sport? b) as better art?

You don't really specify if it is better art, or if it is better than art?

Thus, I conclude by saying your argument as specified by Round 1 is still in a gray area of circular logic and paradoxical.

Sorry!
Debate Round No. 2
Herecomesthedoge

Pro

Herecomesthedoge forfeited this round.
fazz

Con

No comment.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by iamanatheistandthisiswhy 3 years ago
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
HerecomesthedogefazzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Not sure why this debate took place. Points to Con and when you work out why this debate is here please let me know :)
Vote Placed by Tophatdoc 3 years ago
Tophatdoc
HerecomesthedogefazzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: This was clearly a troll debate. Con wins the conduct. Good luck to Con in future debates.