Roadkill is better than Tractors.
Debate Rounds (3)
Tractors are better because they are nicer visualy, not a nusence
Tracors are also better because without them we will all DIE!!!
Roadkill is like graffiti for the road, and graffiti is pretty. So, roadkill is pretty.
So, tractors have no upsides because nobody wants to live anymore anyway. They all want to be roadkill and do something good for the road.
Roadkill is also good because it means that a stupid animal has died, and we don't like stupid animals. Too stupid.
Plus, at least roadkill doesn't have country folk germs on it, whereas tractor seats do.
I have not heard so much rubbish in my life (14 years and a few days)
Who wants to by road kill!
What good does it do to the road I mean really the current roads are more of a grave yard!!!!
What is so bad about country folk .......ME!
Tractors are far superior because without them we would all die because their would not be rnough food
You 'KingDebater"" may say that is a good thing so everyone can commit suicide via road kill .......but who would drive the vehicle
Roadkill is good because even a man with nothing can get it. Just slip it off the road and you're in for the time of your life.
The bad thing about country folk is that they're not city folk and they don't wait 9 hours for the latest iPhone.
Who would be driving the vehicle? When there is only one thing left alive, the driver would leave the vehicle running and then jump in front of it and then become roadkill.
As I said, people don't want to continue living anymore now that they can see the swell time that roadkill has.
Whats swell time mean
Ok roadkill man
If you are so confident on this subject then why is it that after a day the roadkill has vanished
Is it because the tractors scoop scoopes it up ........... doing your dirty work are we
Tractors are better Because they can not become roadkill because thry where not living In the first place
Thanyou very much
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con had better arguments and better spelling and grammar.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.