The Instigator
brian_eggleston
Pro (for)
Winning
12 Points
The Contender
lannan13
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Rodeo sex is rape

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
brian_eggleston
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/29/2012 Category: Society
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 3,326 times Debate No: 22408
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (9)
Votes (5)

 

brian_eggleston

Pro

Definitions
-------------
Rodeo sex: where a gentleman approaches his good lady wife (or girlfriend), who is naked and in a kneeling position, and proceeds to smash her back doors in, and when the lady's excitement reaches the point whereby she starts frothing at the gash, the gentleman calls her by her sister's name and sees how long he can hold on.

Rape: the crime, typically committed by a man, of forcing another person to have sexual intercourse with the offender against their will.

Argument
------------
Although, at the outset, the lady in question may have consented, either explicitly or implicitly, to sexual intercourse with the gentleman, when he calls her by her sister's name, she implicitly withdraws that consent by trying to buck him off her, and from that point on he is committing the crime of rape. Therefore, rodeo sex is rape.

Thank you.
lannan13

Con

Rape- is the unlawful compelling of a person through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse that is against the person's own will. http://dictionary.reference.com...


Arguement
Rape is against one's will. So therefore if the female agrees to do it then it isn't rape.
Debate Round No. 1
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by InVinoVeritas 5 years ago
InVinoVeritas
A true rodeo is when she is about to reach her peak and then you lean over and gently whisper, "I have genital warts." Then you see how long you can hold on.
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
No offense, but it WAS a predictable argument...
Posted by lannan13 5 years ago
lannan13
This guy contered it already jeeze he's good...
Posted by drafterman 5 years ago
drafterman
lannan! You forgot to post your "great arguement(sic)"!
Posted by brian_eggleston 5 years ago
brian_eggleston
Okay, I'll take the age limit off.
Posted by lannan13 5 years ago
lannan13
Whoa...
I've got a great arguement for this but I'm only 15
Posted by Ron-Paul 5 years ago
Ron-Paul
Wait, what?
Posted by brian_eggleston 5 years ago
brian_eggleston
Thanks Freedo, 18+ for this one b/t/w, and only 1 round with a 2,000 character limit.
Posted by FREEDO 5 years ago
FREEDO
Win.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by FREEDO 5 years ago
FREEDO
brian_egglestonlannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: I wish this had more rounds. Kinda lost it's potential.
Vote Placed by MrBrooks 5 years ago
MrBrooks
brian_egglestonlannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: This vote bomb is brought to you by the Non-Alignment Coalition!
Vote Placed by Maikuru 5 years ago
Maikuru
brian_egglestonlannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Once the female removes consent, regardless of her initial approve, the act is rape. Not that this will stop anyway, of course.
Vote Placed by drafterman 5 years ago
drafterman
brian_egglestonlannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Physically attempting to remove another person from one's own orifice is a pretty clear indication of rejection of consent. I'm not aware of "But I was already balls deep!" as a valid defense of rape.
Vote Placed by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
brian_egglestonlannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro front-lined con's argument. It wasn't really well made. Sad birthday