The Instigator
royalpaladin
Pro (for)
Tied
24 Points
The Contender
BlackVoid
Con (against)
Tied
24 Points

RoyalPaladin is Awesome

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 9 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/23/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 9,211 times Debate No: 22481
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (42)
Votes (9)

 

royalpaladin

Pro

Accept, coward ;).

This is the third time :)
BlackVoid

Con

I accept and offer several observations:


O1:
No rules stating that first round is for acceptance.

O2: No rules forbidding semantics.

O3: No rules stating that I don't win this debate by default. Therefore, I win by default.

O4: No definitions provided, therefore, prefer the ones I give.



Definitions:

Dictionary.com has no definition of "RoyalPaladin" (1). Apparently it does not exist.

So since there's no actual definition, I'll just make one up myself. RoyalPaladin is defined as "An intergalactic spaceship, made of penises, whose sole purpose is to bring Adolf Hitler back to life and appoint him as president of the United States". Yeah, that works pretty good.

"is" is defined as "island" (2).


"Awesome" is defined by Urban Dictionary as "You" (3).



Pro might question the validity of Urban Dictionary as a source. However, Grape, one of the best debaters on the site, writes that "Urban dictionary is a source of the highest quality" (4). My source is legit.


Using these definitions, the literal interpretation of the resolution is "An intergalactic spaceship...island you".

As you can see, this makes no sense whatsoever. Wtf is this talking about? My opponent can't even write a coherent debate resolution. Can this person be considered awesome?

So I pretty much win right here, but just for the sake of argument I'll go ahead and make some contentions based on the "normal" definitions you would expect....



C1: Royalpaladin is a horrible person

True for several reasons,

1. Calls me a coward at the beginning of the debate. Coward is defined as "the most insulting word known to man" (5).

2. About 2 weeks ago, Royal married Thett3. Here is one of their threads dedicated to it (6). 11 days later, Thett and Royal are now single and Royal is in a relationship with Mestari (7). Royal has therefore broken Kim Kardashian's record in the Guiness Book of World Records for shortest marriage of all time. She obviously can't maintain a relationship.

More importantly, Royal was sweet-talking Mestari before she even got divorced. Yep. She was sleeping with Mes every night for about 4 days before her official relationship ended. Therefore, she was cheating on her husband. I should win therefore win both Thett3's and the general male vote automatically.

Also note that on Mestari's profile, Royal has been repeatedly calling him "Bunny". Bunny is defined by Urban Dictionary as "an often young, but not exclusively, male who's so inexperienced or so under-endowed that his thrusting pace during sexual intercourse mimics that of a rabbit's" (8). So not only is she cheating on her husband, but she's been tacitly accusing other DDO members of being poor in bed. Again, male vote goes to me.



C2: Royalpaladin is Joseph Kony

Pretty sure we've all heard of the Kony 2012 video, detailing the murders being orchestrated by Joseph Kony in Uganda. Its Royal.

1. Innomen ran an IP check on Royal's account and found that it matches the address of an abandoned igloo in Alaska (9), which is where Joseph Kony is allegedly hiding according to the well-respected news source, Encyclopedia Dramatica.


2. Thett3 recently sent me a PM detailing an encounter he had while married with her. See conversation here (10).


Royal can't be awesome if she is Joseph Kony. Why? Because Joseph Kony is black. The well-known philosopher, Jimtimmy, writes, "Black people are inherently inferior to whites and thus can't be considered awesome in any way". Jimtimmy said it, so it must be right.

Also, Joseph Kony kills babies. This is not awesome. Its also consistent with Royal's position as Pro-Choice, which kills babies. You might say, "but BV, aren't you Pro-Choice too?". Yes I am, and therefore am also a baby-killer. But the debate isn't about me. So yeah.



C3: Royalpaladin is God


Syllogism:

1. Royalpaladin is God

2. Most active people on this site are atheists/agnostics

3. People do not like to be proven wrong

4. If Royal is proven to be God, that would prove most people on this site wrong

5. If Royal is God and proof of her existence causes people to be proven wrong, thus making them angry, then all atheists/agnostics should vote for me in retaliation.


Premises 2-5 are obviously correct and are definently not flawed in any way.


Premise 1 is upheld by the definition of God: "any person or thing to which excessive attention is given" (11).


And by that definition, Royal is obviously God. People have dedicated entire threads to her. People in mafia games are always talking about her. Royal's been in sh1ttons of flame wars. The DDO Forum Post Monitoring Index reports that of the 1 million posts on Debate.org, approximately 12 million of them have been about Royal (12). So she fits the definition of God, therefore providing voter incentive to go Con through the above syllogism.


I await Joseph Kony's response.





1. http://dictionary.reference.com...

2. http://dictionary.reference.com...

3. http://www.urbandictionary.com...

4. http://www.debate.org... (RFD section)

5. http://www.urbandictionary.com...

6. http://www.debate.org...

7. http://www.debate.org...

8. http://www.urbandictionary.com...

9. http://files.turbosquid.com...

10. http://www5.picturepush.com...

11. http://dictionary.reference.com...

12. http://up.liga.ir...

Debate Round No. 1
royalpaladin

Pro

O1: No rules stating that first round is for acceptance.
This was implied when I noted “Accept, coward” in the OP.
O2: No rules forbidding semantics.
Semantics are fine.
O3: No rules stating that I don't win this debate by default. Therefore, I win by default.
There are no rules stating that I don’t win by default either. Vote Pro.
O4: No definitions provided, therefore, prefer the ones I give.
I was under the impression that definitions are provided in-case because that was how I debated in high school.

Definitions
Please extend his “intergalactic spaceship” definition of RoyalPaladin cleanly across the flow. Since none of his arguments have anything to do with intergalactic spaceships, all of his ideas are extratopical and he automatically loses the debate. =P

Please take a look at his source for the definition of “is”. He takes his source out of context and claims that “is” means “island”, but this is false. His own source defines “is” as the “third person singular form of to be”. [1]

At this point, it becomes clear that his argument that I cannot form a proper resolution is false. Even if I accept his ridiculous definition of awesome, the resolution becomes “the intergalactice spaceship . . . is you”. That’s debateable.

I accept Urban Dictionary as a valid source but offer a counterdefinition of awesome. According to Urban Dictionary, awesome is defined as “something or someone that is above average.” [2] So, in order to win this debate, I just have to prove that I am above average in something.

There are four a priori reasons to vote pro. You consider these before we even begin discussing the resolutions.

AP1: BV is a Contract Rep-Killer
Please do not be fooled by my opponent’s seeming “honesty”. He is a contract reputation killer who was hired by LDF to destroy my reputation. LDF was apparently miffed because I tied with her in the cuteness debate without even posting my pics (meaning that my personality alone was just as cute as her looks and personality combined). [3] This situation has two impacts. First, since I am cuter than LDF, who is cuter than the average member of DDO, I am awesome by definition. Second, you literally cannot believe anything that he says because he has a personal incentive to lie about my character and fabricate evidence just so that he can get a week’s worth of access to LDF’s feet.
AP2: I’m totally hawt.
BV tries to get the male vote by misconstruing the definition of Bunny (I’ll get to that later). That’s just dumb. The male vote should go to me because I’m hot and males can’t control themselves around hot women [4]. I hereby declare that any male who wants a shot at me must vote for me. Even if all of his arguments hold water in this round, you vote Pro, suckers. Source 4 proves that I am hawt. BlackVoid, however, is totes ugly, so you can’t vote for him. [5] Source 5 proves that this is true.

AP3: Voting Against Me Will Spark the Loss of U.S. Hegemony
Lannan13, head of the Nation of Kyro, has promised to invade Iceland if I lose this debate. If he invades Iceland, Iceland will think that China has invaded them and will invade China. China will blame England and will invade it. England will think that Canada is responsible, and Canada will believe that the U.S. is responsible. After a series of mishaps, a clandestine group of anti-imperialist fighters will begin to combat U.S. Hegemony. Clearly, voting for the Con is tantamount to sparking international crises.

I have four case arguments. Please note that three of them directly turn some of his contentions.

C1: I have a Bunny and a Kitty.
I have a Bunny. He misconstrues the definition of Bunny. Bunny is defined by Urban Dictionary as “A shadowy figure intent on world domination. No one knows whether bunny is a force for good or evil, but he is building a massive army all across the Internet. All should be wary.” [6] Prefer my definition over his because of AP1 and because I am the one who assigned Mestari the pet name so I know what I meant by it (and he doesn’t). (Plus, if Mestari is a Bunny in his sense of the word, I should get the male vote because it makes other males feel more adequate about themselves :p) Since there is only one Bunny and the Bunny is mine, I have more Bunnies than the average member of the world. I am therefore awesome. Vote Pro. (Plus, my bunny cuddles with me, plays with me, and licks my nose <3)

I also have a Kitty. [7] No other female on DDO has a kitty. I am therefore awesome. Vote Royal.

C2: Insults are awesome
He claims that “coward” is the worst insult known to mankind. Turn this. Since I use the worst insults known to mankind, my insults are better than average. They are therefore awesome. Vote pro.

C3: Cheating is Awesome
He tells you that I cheat. Turn this because it proves that I am awesome. We call people like me “players”. Players are awesome because they have more relationships than the average person. That means that since he admits I am a player, I am awesome. Vote Pro. Plus, if I am more horrible than the average person, I am still awesome because I am better than average. Vote Pro.

C4: I can Build Igloos in Nigeria
He tells you that I am Joseph Kony and that I can build igloos in Nigeria. Turn this, because it proves that I am awesome. Nobody else on this planet can build igloos in Nigeria because the local climate is not conducive to building igloos. That proves that I have more skills than average and am awesome.

A/T Royal is Joseph Kony
He fabricated that evidence. Cross-apply AP1 to confirm this.

A/T Royal is God
This rests entirely on an equivocation fallacy. He is using two different definitions of God to justify his arguments. I accept that people grant me excessive attention, but Atheists hate an omniscient, omnipresent being, and not individuals who get excessive attention (which is clearly proven by the fact that they all fawn over Megan Fox). He is using two different definitions of God in his argument and is thus committing the equivocation fallacy. He also concedes that I am awesome because I get more attention than the ordinary individual.

A/T Babykiller
1. Cross-apply AP1
2. I don’t even know what babies are, so I can’t be a babykiller. Can someone explain what babies are to me?

Sources
1. http://dictionary.reference.com...
2. http://www.urbandictionary.com...
3. http://tinypic.com...
4. http://www.onesmartclick.com...
5.http://images2.fanpop.com...
6. http://www.urbandictionary.com...
7. http://www.urbandictionary.com...
BlackVoid

Con

My opponent's entire argument is based on the false assumption that logic is logical.

Its not.



O1: Pro happily refutes the arguments I present in R1 so there seems to be no issue.

O2: http://upload.wikimedia.org...

O3: I agree, there are no rules stating that *either* of us don't win. I say we both get the W.

O4: "that was how I debated in high school." - Whats debate???


Definitions:

Turn topicality - she concedes the Intergalactic Spaceship definition which means as Pro she must affirm that its awesome and I must negate it. Neither of us have done so as we've talked only about a DDO user. However, as holder of the BoP (she's making a claim that something is greater than average) she's the one that suffers most from topicality as there are no arguments put forward that affirm.

The island definition of "is" is clearly listed on the Asian Porn site, scroll down a little bit to the 69 section.

Prefer my Awesome definition - she drops the Nonexistent Source evidence which indicates that all definitions offered by Con are preferable because Izbo10 said so. Why is everything Izbo says true? Because Izbo10 said so.


AP1:

Pro is right, I was hired to tarnish Pro's reputation, except not by LDF. I was hired by...Royal herself. Thats right. She personally hired me to make her look like a fool on this debate. Why? Because in reality it would create the opposite effect. By making her out as a flawed (not awesome) person, it humanizes her by causing her to be more relatable to the general populace and thus more well liked and appreciated. So in reality, the Contract argument turns against her because Pro feels illegitimately appreciated to the point where she must hire others to use reverse psychology to make her more appealing. I can provide the PM conversation where this started if necessary *wink*.

As for LDF, my opponent can't prove that she's cuter because she has no pic. See below.


AP2:

I'm disappointed that my opponent has stalked my Facebook profile and stolen a picture of my girlfriend to impersonate as herself. I didn't think she could resort to such thing....



As for the other pic, hell yeah thats me. You got a problem? What, you think I'm ugly just because I'm BLACK?! Goddamn you racist mothaf*cka!! Jus becuz im blck dosnt meen im not smrt or sexy!!!!

Pro is clearly racist against my sexy 550-pound black a$$ and therefore is not awesome.


AP3:

Impact turn - International crisis good. The United Midget Association writes, "International destruction would contrapize the apocalyptic cosmopolitan reality simulatorial abligurition mechanism therefore stimulating the flambuginous illustrative cataclysm which jectigatizes the uniquarian viscerononic xylopyrography, leading to the conclusion that sesquipidality ontologically nullifies the regulatorial zeugmatographic value of monosyllabic floccinaucinihilipilification."



C1:

Pro says she knows what Bunny really means because she gave Mestari the name. Assume her definition for now. The definition she offers includes the phrase "No one knows whether bunny is a force for good or evil". So she's dating a person who she doesn't even know if they're a good person....

Second, the definition also defines Bunny as "A shadowy figure intent on world domination". If she supports someone who wants to conquer the world, this contradicts her earlier argument on AP3 implying that International Crisis would be a bad thing.

Pro says she has a kitty but doesn't say which of the 6 listed definitions she is using on her source. So I'll pick from the page for her. Kitty is "a cute and hip Japanese term for someone who is crazy." So the people Pro is surrounded by are a person who wants to destroy the world, and a crazy person. Great....


C2: Insults

What if your insults cause people to feel depressed and kill themselves? Thats what Koopin did...



C3:


Pro says she's a player and that this makes her awesome. Except Player is defined as "A male who is skilled at manipulating others". Is Pro coming out as a transexual now? Its ok if she is, I guess. Would increase site diversity...

C4:

Straw man! The igloo was stated as being in Alaska, not Nigeria. Where's Nigeria coming from? She says Nigeria is too hot to build igloos. Do you hate black people so much that you have to start bashing our weather now???

Anyway, this misinterpretation causes her to drop the Innomen and Encyclopedia Dramatica evidence showing that Pro is living in the exact same place Joseph Kony is, ergo, she is Joseph Kony, mass murderer/serial killer. Not awesome, vote Con.


God


Pro accuses me of the Equivocation Fallacy. On a serious note I'll point out that just about every argument we've made in this debate has been some sort of fallacy, so I dont think this holds much weight. Anyways,


TURN - fallacies good. The use of bad logic gives us a standard to determine what strong logic is. If no one used fallacies, we wouldn't be able to appreciate sound arguments because they could only be compared to other sound arguments. Comparison: Pizza only tastes better than other foods so long as other foods taste worse. If bad tasting food (fallacies) didn't exist, Pizza wouldn't be regarded as tasting better then other foods. Therefore, by committing logical fallacies, I contribute to our appreciation of sound logic and thus maintain our current debate standards. Extend argument.


Baby killer

Pro doesn't know what babies are. This is a baby (2).


Summary:

1. Pro isn't awesome because Izbo said so.
2. Pro isn't awesome because Askbob said so.
3. Pro isn't awesome because inferno said so.
4. Pro isn't awesome because Justin Bieber said so.
5. All 4 of those people are 100% credible.
6. Resolution negated.

Good luck :)


Now I'll introduce a few new arguments. Not abuse since Pro has a *chance * to respond.

C5: Royal has admitted that she's not awesome. See private PM here. She plainly tells me, "Yeah I know this whole debate was a joke, I know I'm not awesome. Honestly I'm fine if everyone just votes for you, I never really had a chance from the start :)" -
dafk.net/what/

C6: Pro is against the Border Fence. Obviously she wants all the Mexicans to come here and steal our jobs. Its an established scientific fact that every immigrant to the US costs us 2 billion dollars each every year. Oh wait, Pro lives in New York, which is generally unaffected by Latino immigration. No wonder she doesn't care about the ramifications :(

C7: Royal is Pro Welfare, AKA, she wants us to give our money to her for no reason with nothing in return.

C8: Pro sexually harasses other members. Here's a link to one instance - debate.org/forums/debate.org/topic/20205/. Sexual harassment is punishable by 50 years prison time and a fine of 250 million dollars.

C9: Pro doesn't know what babies are. I mean, wtf bro :(

C10: Pro does not exist. Reasoning - solipsism. Warrant for Solipsism - none. You can't be awesome if you don't exist.



1. http://www.urbandictionary.com...
2. http://unconfirmedsources.com...


Debate Round No. 2
royalpaladin

Pro

Framework
He claims that my case is false because it presumes that logic is logical and then asserts that it is not. You shouldn't buy this argument at all; it rests on a bare assertion fallacy. He asserts that my case rests on logic without proving this to be true, and he asserts that logic is illogical. The argument is warrantless. He needs to provide warrants before we buy it.

Definitions
He turns topicality and concedes that his arguments are nontopical. He then tells you that I have the BoP. This is false. When we say something is average, we give reasons as to why it is average/mediocre (which means average). When we say something is awesome, we just exclaim "GASP! THAT'S AWESOME!" without any rational justification. So, the BoP rests entirely on him to prove that the spaceship is mediocre/average. If he cannot, I win the debate because we presume that it is awesome.

He defines "is" as island according to a porn site. He's changing his source here. Accept his previous source because that was the one he posted first. In addition, my Bunny says that "is" is not an island (he knows because he has conquered the whole world.). Since my Bunny said it, it must be true. If you don't believe me, just look at the Bunny porn source that my opponent provided.

He then says that his nonexistent source is best because izbo said it. The problem is that he drops the argument I haven't yet made about how my Bunny knows everything because he has conquered the universe. Insofar as this is true, and my Nonexistent Source says he is wrong about everything because my Bunny says so, all of his definitions are wrong and you accept mine.

I love my Bunny <3

AP1
He tells you that I hired him in order to humanize myself and make myself more appealing. That's nonsense. First, you can extend the dropped source that I provided that explicitly notes that he was hired by LDF in exchange for a week's access to her toes (so he can lick da toes-he has a toe fetish: yuck). I don't need to hire him to make myself more attractive because 1. I am totally hawt and guys don't care about personality; they only care about physical looks and 2. I have a Bunny and he loves me and I don't need anybody else. <3

He then says I am not cuter because I don't have a pic. Remember from the previous speech that I noted that this is exactly why LDF hired him to attack me. I tied LDF in a cuteness debate without providing a single pic, meaning that my personality alone is cuter than her looks and her personality combined. I am obviously cuter than she is. Plus, I am totally hawt so I am definitely cute :)

AP2
Shh, you weren't supposed to tell anybody about our secret relationship! Why would you tell everyone that we are dating? I cannot believe this, BlackVoid. I agreed to be your GF on Facebook but not on DDO. You have to give me back those unscrupulous pics.

He accuses me of racism. Do you have a problem with racists, BlackVoid? Just because I am racist doesn't mean that I'm wrong or uncute! He's using ad homs to justify his analysis!

He's racist against racists. I am more racist than the average DDO user and am therefore awesome.

On a side note, he is ugly because he is a 550 lb. sumo. It has nothing to do with his race.
AP3
I discussed how voting for me promotes U.S. heg. His argument is that a bunch of tiny midgets used big words and said that international crises are good.

First, my opponent is wrong because he looks like this: http://3.bp.blogspot.com...
Second, his source is biased. A midget is defined as "A waste of time for a sexual experience"[1].International crises are good for midgets because in the ensuing chaos they would be able to use their midget powers in order to hypnotize people into thinking that they are not a waste of time for sexual experiences [2]. His source is therefore biased because the organization is only thinking about itself so that it has the opportunity to hop aboard the RoyalPaladin and soar.

That's just demeaning. Ignore it and Vote Pro.

C1
He first says that nobody knows whether Bunny is good or bad. Who cares as long as I keep him in check? He then says that I contradict AP3 because Bunny is bent on world domination. This is false. Bunny does not need chaos in order to dominate the world (although midgets like BlackVoid do). Bunny is conquering the world through the New World Order. [3] According to Geo, the NWO already has control of the world, so the chaos weakens Bunny's power.

I'm not showing my kitty to DDO, BlackVoid. Nice try. He defines it with a false definition in hopes that I show it to DDO to disprove him. That's demeaning.

C2
He says my insults can depress people and cause them to kill themselves. Turn this back because it leads to population reduction and therefore curbs the rise of starvation and famines in the future. I am promoting what is good for humanity according to Thomas Malthus. Pro wants people to starve and die. I outweigh in terms of reduction of harms.

C3
My opponent is sexist! He says only men can be players! That's wrong! Why can't girls be players too? What's the term for a girl who does the same thing that those men do, huh?

Con is sexist because he is promoting sexual double standards. That's an AP reason to vote Pro.

C4
He is being racist because he tells you that Nigerians can't live in Alaska. Why? Plus, Alaska is defined as "great place for digging oil". [4] Nigeria happens to be famous for oil exports. Therefore, Nigeria is Alaska and is the location of the igloo. Thus, I am the only person who can build an igloo in Nigeria and am thus awesome.

He tells you that I am a mass murderer. Extend the dropped evidence from C2 about how I am promoting population reduction and am therefore reducing harms to humanity.

God
He tells you that everything we've done has been fallacious. None of my arguments are fallacious, but he admits that his arguments are. Plus, he just committed the tu quoque fallacy. Even if I did use fallacies, it doesn't justify him using them.

He turns and says fallacies are good. Sure. That doesn't mean that you extend his arguments though because they are wrong. It was nice of him to give a display of flawed argumentation, but he still admitted that his arguments are false.

Sources
1. http://www.urbandictionary.com...
2. http://www.whalliance.com...
3. http://www.urbandictionary.com...
4. http://www.urbandictionary.com...
BlackVoid

Con

So that we both have 2 main rounds of debate, this will just be conclusion/extentions.


Conclusion:

Pro drops my last six, count em, SIX contentions, all of which individually negate. Contentions 5-10 in my last round all went unanswered. They may not have been apparent at first glance, but they're clearly visible by highlighting everything under my "good luck" quote in the last round, or visiting this link - http://tinyurl.com...

As you can see, they were hidden with invisible text. I figured I'd do something crazy like this to get my opponent back for all the babies she's killed in Uganda. Its sad. Nevertheless, all 6 of those contentions were completely dropped and thus should be extended as legit arguments against the resolution. This pretty much outweighs any previous arguments Pro might have had an advantage on, so the victor is clear. And remember, its true because Izbo said so.





Thanks to Royal for a cool troll debate.


(Btw, we agreed that this will end in a tie since its a joke, anyone's vote giving net points to one side should be neutralized).


Debate Round No. 3
42 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by 1dustpelt 5 years ago
1dustpelt
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
nac
Posted by royalpaladin 5 years ago
royalpaladin
<3

nac
Posted by Mestari 5 years ago
Mestari
<3

nac
Posted by royalpaladin 5 years ago
royalpaladin
I have a Guard Bunny!
Posted by Mestari 5 years ago
Mestari
He has a guard dog, be careful.
Posted by royalpaladin 5 years ago
royalpaladin
I'll steal it back . . . with a bag.
Posted by royalpaladin 5 years ago
royalpaladin
:(

TORRES, I'M COMING FOR YOU!

nac
Posted by Mestari 5 years ago
Mestari
I'm sorry. . . Torres stole my heart. . . With a pair of pliers. . .
Posted by royalpaladin 5 years ago
royalpaladin
Don't leave me . . .
Posted by royalpaladin 5 years ago
royalpaladin
No . . ..
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
royalpaladinBlackVoidTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: You know what's better than one troll in a debate? Two trolls in a debate. What's better than two trolls in a debate? The holocaust- NO BAD ZARADI. RACISM BAD. BAD ZARADI.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
royalpaladinBlackVoidTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision:
Vote Placed by 1dustpelt 5 years ago
1dustpelt
royalpaladinBlackVoidTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: (\__/) n (='.'=) a (")_(") c
Vote Placed by cheesedingo1 5 years ago
cheesedingo1
royalpaladinBlackVoidTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: Whenever I jump off something, I imagine I am a bird, and feel great until I hit the ground.
Vote Placed by vmpire321 5 years ago
vmpire321
royalpaladinBlackVoidTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: aejwrneFKVSDLJUOZ)(E*UĂș54er554tcDO)S(UR()#*@UHkndzslkrew546~~~5t6dzdxjfo43wn5aAArrwES5r5435hjrKDDZ*``DSFFJAWELKV,M.N cvjlksaer-kljfalkje lkaefe-343\4\dsaf*-/-*D/f8654ews55trfpd8)(*$#)(IJLK34REFD69532REWSFD8C56354WRJ9089i8)(D*Fejkrdcf.mrflkejrkdf;lkP(I#$RRmr.ekeopsfipdoKF;lem,.,fmd.,JF:LK;i-F55FDwSF9DS0FDS F DSiF99 ewr/8ew98rf6ds4cx32132sw1r3e9/sz63c12xwr/e9edsarp54DF98aSDZ(F
Vote Placed by thett3 5 years ago
thett3
royalpaladinBlackVoidTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: turtle
Vote Placed by Microsuck 5 years ago
Microsuck
royalpaladinBlackVoidTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: RoyalDalphin is the goddess!
Vote Placed by renji_abarai 5 years ago
renji_abarai
royalpaladinBlackVoidTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: Asked for a Tie
Vote Placed by Wallstreetatheist 5 years ago
Wallstreetatheist
royalpaladinBlackVoidTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: Mine eyes hath been unsheathed