Hello MrMagic, I have chosen to take up the debate as con, arguing that russia does not have every right to annex the Crimea. Is it safe to assume we are only talking about the common definition of Crimea, which includes only the peninsula, and the port of Sevastopol?
Then I'm very sorry. However, a lot of people don't argue from conviction here. If you want a genuine supporter, you may want to state clearly that your opponent must be a true, hardcore supporter of this or that position. If you want to avoid idiots like me in the future (again, I apologize fully) you can also make sure you clearly state your position in your first argument as well. Some people have a tendency to assume you automatically took "pro" for the statement you are making. Again, I'm very sorry for ruining the debate.