The Instigator
KingDebater
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
lannan13
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Ryback should be fired.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/11/2013 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,546 times Debate No: 33572
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)

 

KingDebater

Pro

When watching WWE, if you're one of those people who gets bored extremely easy, after watching about 100 hours of CM Punk whoop everyone's butt, you may start to feel a tiny bit bored. Next, you see Ryback, a boulder of muscle. You may think that CM Punk would finally lose, but then you'd be wrong [1] [2]. Ryback is absolutely rubbish.

In round 1, the opponent will make (s)his case.

Sources
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...(2012)
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org...(2012)
lannan13

Con

I accept and now I'll show you why Ryback is better and how Punk should actually be fired through my debate.

1. SHIELD interferance

If we look into many of these matches we can see that Ryback should have beaten Punk if it wasn't for the interfearance of the SHIELD. http://www.insidetheropes.co.uk... SHIELD has interviened many times on the part of CM Punk. Each time screwing Ryback out of the WWE championship. The most notable is during a WWE title match on RAW between Ryback and CM Punk and Punk was down for the count outside the ring. Ryback was at the top of the ladder when the lights go off and the SHIELD attack him him and Punk wins the fight. (see video) www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlUo35avYck So that goes to show you that CM Punk is scared of Ryback.

2. Brad Maddox interferance

During Hell in a Cell the match was basicly over when Ryback had CM Punk on his shoulders getting ready for the Shellshocker, but the reff., Brad Maddox, racked Ryback and CM Punk pinned him as a result. (see second video)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=wm1sxixRS_U But to make things worse we learn that Brad Maddox was actually on Paul Hayman's payroll. For those of you who don't know Paul Hayman is CM Punk's manager. (see thrid video) www.youtube.com/watch?v=Teot5b1BIpo


3. Punk Should be fired!
As we have learned that the SHIELD and Brad Maddox were both hired by Paul Hayman and CM Punk to keep CM Punk champion, so it's obvious that he should be fired, but if you don't believe me lets look at the fourth video. www.youtube.com/watch?v=omdKiGhWHmM http://bleacherreport.com...



So in conclusion Ryback shouldn't be fired but CM Punk should.
Debate Round No. 1
KingDebater

Pro

Crazy Con (seriously, surprisingly)says: 1. SHIELD interferance

If we look into many of these matches we can see that Ryback should have beaten Punk if it wasn't for the interfearance of the SHIELD. http://www.insidetheropes.co.uk... has interviened many times on the part of CM Punk. Each time screwing Ryback out of the WWE championship. The most notable is during a WWE title match on RAW between Ryback and CM Punk and Punk was down for the count outside the ring. Ryback was at the top of the ladder when the lights go off and the SHIELD attack him him and Punk wins the fight. (see video)www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlUo35avYck So that goes to show you that CM Punk is scared of Ryback.

2. Brad Maddox interferance

During Hell in a Cell the match was basicly over when Ryback had CM Punk on his shoulders getting ready for the Shellshocker, but the reff., Brad Maddox, racked Ryback and CM Punk pinned him as a result. (see second video)www.youtube.com/watch?v=wm1sxixRS_U But to make things worse we learn that Brad Maddox was actually on Paul Hayman's payroll. For those of you who don't know Paul Hayman is CM Punk's manager. (see thrid video)www.youtube.com/watch?v=Teot5b1BIpo


3. Punk Should be fired!
As we have learned that the SHIELD and Brad Maddox were both hired by Paul Hayman and CM Punk to keep CM Punk champion, so it's obvious that he should be fired, but if you don't believe me lets look at the fourth video.www.youtube.com/watch?v=omdKiGhWHmM http://bleacherreport.com......



So in conclusion Ryback shouldn't be fired but CM Punk should.

Con's arguments attempt to prove that CM Punk should be fired, but in reality, those matches come to the conclusion that if anyone should be fired, it should be Paul Heyman. He's the one who paid the shield to interfere, and the one who bribed Brad Maddox to cheat radical ryback out of the Dynamic WWE Championship.

My argument
As we all know, people are getting more fat [1]. This means we do not need to encourage people to get more fat, and as we all know, when a WWE superstar gets the WWE championship, whatever slogans they have will inevitably become more popular. Ryback has been chasing the WWE Championship for quite a while [2], and he's inevitably going to get it sooner or later. Ryback's catchphrase 'Feed me more' will then be popularized and help obesity grow, which would be bad. Children and adults will spouting that phrase, 'feed me more'. It will encourage eating loads. It will create a world in which this scenario is common:

[Fatty eats a billion burgers]
Responsible/healthy adult: I think that's enought for you, you chocolate-chasing boulder of blubber.
Fat slob: FEED ME MORE! [Chuckles, with fat vibrating viciously]
Responsible/healthy adult: Oh alright, if you insist
[Responsible/healthy adult shoves down a trillion more burgers down fatzo's piehole]

So, this is why WWE stinkerstar Ryback should be fired. He needs to be fired before his devious plan is put into action, and more importantly, before he causes even more terrible tragedy and disgusting disaster.

Sources
[1] http://healthyamericans.org...;
[2] http://www.wwe.com...
lannan13

Con

1. My arguements

My opponent doesn't touch any of these so extend all my points here.

My conclusion from last round
My opponent says that the what I brought up proves that Paul Hayman should be fired, but the fact that CM Punk is the one who is and was pulling the strings on Hayman show the fact that he should be fired.

2. His arguements

Ryback has the phrase Feed Me More, but that doesn't mean anything. For example, the Undertaker uses the phrase rest in peace, but you don't see people going around giving people tombstones and doing Undertaker's signature cut throat taunt. Even Stone Cold Steve Austin http://www.wwe.com... flips people off and cusses and drinks bear, but you don't see the youth of today drinking bear and fliping off teachers. Ryback isn't fat he is actually overlly muscluar to the point to where he looks like a huge musclular Baustista. (see second video) ;

So you can see that Ryback shouldn't be fired because of his theme of which he represents since there has been others in the past WWE history that have been worse like Stone Cold and the Undertaker.

So with that Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 2
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by KingDebater 4 years ago
KingDebater
Yes Lannan, but little kids love WWE and love Ryback. Steve Austin isn't loved by many children today, and the undertaker's influence is his streak.
Posted by lannan13 4 years ago
lannan13
I don't know why the text did that.
No votes have been placed for this debate.