The Instigator
WorstLife
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
beachy
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

SJW's are psychopaths

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The Voting Period Ends In
177days18hours02minutes43seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/1/2016 Category: People
Updated: 2 days ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 114 times Debate No: 97518
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)

 

WorstLife

Pro

You triggered me, i sexually identify as a female male bigender tzeentch neutrois khorne intergender demifiend demiboy hellboy genderqueer / non binary pangender/poligender epicene genderfluid transgender will of fire third gender Agender/genderless bipolarjunction transistor androgyne civil/attack helicopter demigod unown F nazi earth moon mars jupiter separatist stargate trans-am mayonaise between 1 and 3 knots southward bigender androgyne and neutrois bigender third gender adn demi-boy nurgle a turn off australian male agender version 1 curse of hatred agender gendervoid femme slaanesh travesti n-b aliagender butch monsoon necron demiagender assassin sun mercury venus saturn uranus neptune pluto zion rate of genderfluidty prince transnigger dont sexually harrass me you cis white male scum
beachy

Con

1. Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by persistent antisocial behavior, impaired empathy and remorse, and bold, disinhibited, egotistical traits.
https://en.wikipedia.org...

2. Social justice calls for accountability. For example, in social justice "racism" is defined as widely held attitudes, or beliefs held by the majority of oppressive people that result in widespread, systematic discrimination against the minority group. By this definition, people of color cannot be racist. Since the oppressors are the ones that are creating the system of oppression, social justice calls the oppressors to dismantle the systems of oppression.
http://everydayfeminism.com......
http://www.alternet.org......
http://everydayfeminism.com......

I also recommend this social justice subreddit to learn more.
reddit.com/r/socialjustice101

Basically, social justice calls for people to examine their own prejudices and beliefs and to try to change them so people can be treated fairly and have equal opportunities without regards to race, gender, etc. at one point in history, women couldn't vote. People had to change their attitudes

3. You only cited extremists.

I cited a few articles in point #1.

4. Social justice is one of the most peaceful movements in history, compared to Nazism and other violent movements.
I never heard of violence in the movement, but I know some are extreme in their beliefs. However this does not speak for all SJWs
Debate Round No. 1
WorstLife

Pro

>"Social justice is one of the most peaceful movements in history" smh
beachy

Con

Most SJWs are peaceful.
http://everydayfeminism.com...

Can you site an example of SJW violence?
Debate Round No. 2
beachy

Con

1. You cited a few extreme SJWs who do not speak for the majority.

2. SJWs are addressing a wide range of issues that affect society such as racism, sexism, homophobia, etc.

Racism
http://www.alternet.org...

Earl Sampson was stopped 258 times by the police in four years. All those times he was accused or ARRESTED for trespassing at the store where he works.
http://www.reuters.com...

A few years ago ABC's "What would You Do?" did an experiment where they had 3 white kids spray paint, jump on and destroy a car for three hours. Only one person called 911. Then they had 3 black kids vandalize, jump on and destroy a car for three hours. Ten people called 911. ONE 911 call vs TEN 911 calls. Then at the end of part one someone called 911 TWICE saying 2 black men SLEEPING in a car "look like they're possibly getting ready to rob somebody".
https://www.youtube.com...
https://www.youtube.com...

Sexism
http://gender.stanford.edu...
http://everydayfeminism.com...
A Yale study had researches sent out fake applications to top, research-intensive universities in the United States. All applications were identical, except have were named John and half were named Jennifer. Professors were asked to evaluate how competent this student was, how likely they would be to hire the student, how much they would pay this student, and how willing they would be to mentor the student.
The professors were more likely to rate John as more competent and pay John a higher salary. Female professors showed bias too. http://www.yalescientific.org...
http://news.yale.edu...
http://gender.stanford.edu...
This study only focused on STEM fields, but on average woman make 78% of what a man makes, even when factoring education, work hours, etc. The gap is worse for woman of color.
http://www.aauw.org...

Ableism
http://everydayfeminism.com...
https://www.youtube.com...
http://thatcrazycrippledchick.blogspot.com...
SJWs are addressing "inspiration porn", which is when an able bodied person calls a disabled person inspirational for doing ordinary things.
https://www.youtube.com...

Calling a disabled person "inspirational" is fine if you are actually inspired by the person. if you are calling a disabled person inspiration because you decided the person has it worse off than you, that is offensive. It is insulting to suggest someone has it worse off simply because they live in a different body.

Transphobia
Laverne Cox Speech on Sexism & Transphobia
https://www.youtube.com...
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by geho89 5 hours ago
geho89
I meant to vote for Con, but I will see if this can get fixed.
Posted by ghostdance11 4 days ago
ghostdance11
I peed my pants reading this
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by geho89 6 hours ago
geho89
WorstLifebeachyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: This debate was limited on substance. Pro opened with a nonsensical statement that did not at all relate to the claim. The claim itself was too general, which leaves the audience to interpret it as all, some, or perhaps a specific set of SJW being psychopaths. Con was able to somewhat managed to define a psychopath, but a credible dictionary version is preferred. Con was not able to successfully define what a SJW is and cited websites that only provided news that might be related to SJW, but not credible facts, studies, or research. An example is the claim "Social justice is one of the most peaceful movements in history," with no sources or evidence that this is in fact true. Con also brings up a contradiction of never hearing of violence in the movement, but know that some are extreme in their beliefs. Pro provided no argument or counterarguments in this debate and merely cited sources that I have no clue whether it supports his non-argument or not.