The Instigator
sadolite
Pro (for)
Losing
39 Points
The Contender
knick-knack
Con (against)
Winning
131 Points

Sadolite has the worst record probly in the history of debate .com

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 25 votes the winner is...
knick-knack
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/18/2008 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 4,868 times Debate No: 5460
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (42)
Votes (25)

 

sadolite

Pro

I believe I have the worst win ratio in the history of debate.org LOL. Aren't you people glad I don't care. You just have to laugh because I know there are people that are far worse debaters than I with better records. I will be back with another controversial debate soon stay tuned. My current record is 0 and 26
knick-knack

Con

Actually Solarman1969 has a worse win ratio

66 debates
1 win
65losses

1.52% win ratio

That's worse than Sadolites...=^)+<
Debate Round No. 1
42 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by sadolite 8 years ago
sadolite
I think I had established that when I posted the debate I was in last place and still remain there.
Posted by knick-knack 8 years ago
knick-knack
I think we had established already that when I posted my argument you were not the worst.
Posted by sadolite 8 years ago
sadolite
ournamestoolong, My opponents figures are incorrect, check my profile.
Posted by ournamestoolong 8 years ago
ournamestoolong
How exactly? He proved you wrong.

But I mean, who needs proof when you have a really stubborn opinion.
Posted by sadolite 8 years ago
sadolite
I am in last place again, I should be winning this debate.
Posted by Blackwater 8 years ago
Blackwater
ha! my vote pushed the score over
Posted by Blackwater 8 years ago
Blackwater
stupid vote bombing. sadolite didn't even hold his own.
Posted by antisemantic 8 years ago
antisemantic
Posted by Mangani 1 day ago
So you must either be cheating by creating multiple accounts,

or you have formed an alliance with a bunch of other people who are hurt when they lose a debate.

Pay attention to the last breath of this sentence.

Who has been crying about losing debates for the pat week.

Sadolite is right. ALL this started with the cleaners. The cleaners have been here longer then you know. They are just now out of the closet but they have been a vote bloc for some time now.
Posted by sadolite 8 years ago
sadolite
Have you ever considered the fact that the Cleaners" are a direct result of my win ratio? Good intentions almost always end up in disaster. Look at Kleptins record, he is the leader of this crusade called the "Cleaners". I believe the overwhelming majority perceive this group as a vote bombing group and my name coming up all the time in connection to this group gives the perception of your group singling me out, thus giving the perception of corruption. Not to mention all of the comments made by it's members that say people should lose debates "automatically" or this debate needs to be "fixed" or other such comments that smack of a concerted effort to change and corrupt the voting process. I predicted this would happen weeks ago and it has.
Posted by Mangani 8 years ago
Mangani
So you must either be cheating by creating multiple accounts, or you have formed an alliance with a bunch of other people who are hurt when they lose a debate. You must know, in all honesty, that logically you have lost at least some of these debates, right? Or do you have no sense of integrity whatsoever?
25 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by ournamestoolong 8 years ago
ournamestoolong
sadoliteknick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by JBlake 8 years ago
JBlake
sadoliteknick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by TxsRngr 8 years ago
TxsRngr
sadoliteknick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by NYCDiesel 8 years ago
NYCDiesel
sadoliteknick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by HempforVictory 8 years ago
HempforVictory
sadoliteknick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by fresnoinvasion 8 years ago
fresnoinvasion
sadoliteknick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Johnicle 8 years ago
Johnicle
sadoliteknick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by frank_gore_is_da_best 8 years ago
frank_gore_is_da_best
sadoliteknick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Ped-X-ing 8 years ago
Ped-X-ing
sadoliteknick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Desert_Shield 8 years ago
Desert_Shield
sadoliteknick-knackTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07