The Instigator
Eugenia12346
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Jonbonbon
Con (against)
Winning
24 Points

Schools should have a longer lunch time

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Jonbonbon
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/10/2014 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 616 times Debate No: 45545
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (4)
Votes (5)

 

Eugenia12346

Pro

Schools should have longer lunch periods because the recommended time is 20 minutes and the average lunch time is 31 minutes. People that disagree mostly have a pretty long lunch period compared to others.
Jonbonbon

Con

Exerpt from Jonbonbon's Abridged Encyclopedia of Education 2nd Edition:

"High schools deal with smaller issues, like lunch, within their district... While there are recommendations for such things there is not federal control over them. This is best as districts best know their students better when concerning minor issues."

Basically, we don't need to just raise the minimum time, because the districts are already covering that area, and the federal government shouldn't change that.
Debate Round No. 1
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Jonbonbon 3 years ago
Jonbonbon
The other side wasn't trolling.

Besides, I've had to reform my trolling, because I got in trouble for my former style of trolling. So now instead of telling someone my negative opinion of them, I hit them in the head (over the Internet) with my self-non-published encyclopedia.
Posted by PiercedPanda 3 years ago
PiercedPanda
Both sides of the debate. Trundle is not pleased.
Posted by Jonbonbon 3 years ago
Jonbonbon
Wait who are you talking to? XD
Posted by PiercedPanda 3 years ago
PiercedPanda
You are disgrace to the troll community. I am a messenger from trundle, the king of trolls.
(League of legends). He has informed me that you are but an amateur, attempting to be a troll. Trundle is greatly enraged, and would like to ks all your attacks. Only true trolls will understand this. Entry from the legend of the trolls, version 69: "Those who say they are trolls are false. They all experience lack of a real troll. Because of this, all fake trolls should be painted purple, and sent to the armadillo tribunal, and edited for processing."
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by TheOncomingStorm 3 years ago
TheOncomingStorm
Eugenia12346JonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: If you need an explanation for this, you can talk to me in the comments section.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
Eugenia12346JonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con brought up more points.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
Eugenia12346JonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pretty clear within the constitution.
Vote Placed by BeckyDawg 3 years ago
BeckyDawg
Eugenia12346JonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: A pity that this was only one round. Pro only speculated certain aspects of his or her argument.
Vote Placed by emilydebate 3 years ago
emilydebate
Eugenia12346JonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: This debate was short, but Con did better.