Science is false.
Debate Rounds (4)
It looks like it's a free win for me!
First round is for acceptance.
Science can be formalized....
.... as a syllogism!
P1) Research, test and repeat.
P2) The first premise works.
C) Science works!
However, it's missing an infinite amount of premises. You also need to have the premise that if A, then B and A is true, then B. And so forth forever. So, science is so circular and self-serving or something like that.
Also, a gap in the fossil record.
tell me the reason behind the miracles of science .you can't just put over the argument that science is false can you give me those explanations which are proved by science and invented with the help of science just tell me
1. you are on website debate.org it is real made with the help of science is it not working ? it should not if it is only based on premises
2. malaria is avoided by an injection ? is it false?
3. power is generating , transmitted to your home, you are watching a tv is it false ?
4. all world is studying science are all mad?
5. see all things around you and just you science is the only thing that will give all answers
.....you can not just make all things false by just giving a statement apart from that if you say that it is assumed that if a is true than b....i want to tell you that science is testable explanation and most of the universe mystery are proved by science when it is assumed it doesn't matter if it is properly working on our physical universe .......in your words that is assumption in my words that is theories of science that is continuously observing working ......and not stopped still exploring and it will continue for proving our universe
According to con, science is knowledge. To back up the claim that science is true, he is using knowledge (science). Talk about a circular argument, lol.
I would give more of a reply, but I think that's all I need to say to refute the stupid and wacky claims of science.
You can't prove it!
My argument still stands.
You are trying to prove science with science. That is circular.
We know science is true because of science and we know that the science we're using to prove science is reliable because of science...
That is circular. That is your argument.
All arguments extended.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by donald.keller 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: If this is a troll debate, Pro did a poor job of implying it. While experienced members might have seen it as one, a new member never would have. Even in a troll debate, the troll has to refute his opponents claims, even if with fools logic.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.