The Instigator
Aussiewhitegirl
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Emilrose
Con (against)
Winning
27 Points

Sea food is gross

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Emilrose
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/29/2015 Category: Funny
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 521 times Debate No: 75949
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (5)

 

Aussiewhitegirl

Pro

Sea food is gross because it tastes really bad and usually it feels really weird. This isn't really a debate I'm just telling everyone Sea food is gross. That's why this debate is only 5 minutes long.
Emilrose

Con

Accepted.

Firstly, Pro is exclusively arguing from personal opinion and thus not making an objective case; or asserting their argument to be correct in any way.

Simply stating "sea food is gross" does not constitute a valid case.

Seafood is in fact one of the healthiest foods you can eat and has a number of health benefits [1.] http://seafoodhealthfacts.org...

These benefits specifically come with eating fish [2.] http://www.everydayhealth.com...

Additionally, many people genuinely enjoy the taste of seafood--therefore contradicting Pros claim that it is entirely "gross".
Debate Round No. 1
Aussiewhitegirl

Pro

Aussiewhitegirl forfeited this round.
Emilrose

Con

Looks like five minutes was a bad idea.
Debate Round No. 2
Aussiewhitegirl

Pro

Aussiewhitegirl forfeited this round.
Emilrose

Con

Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Emilrose 1 year ago
Emilrose
Tbh you didn't really have enough time to.
Posted by Aussiewhitegirl 1 year ago
Aussiewhitegirl
Yeah aha. Honestly I'll I think you'll win the points seeing as I can't think of an argument against your good ones.
Posted by Emilrose 1 year ago
Emilrose
Well I have! And I don't even like seafood either.
Posted by Aussiewhitegirl 1 year ago
Aussiewhitegirl
To be honest I didn't think anyone would accept this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Henceforth_Truth 1 year ago
Henceforth_Truth
AussiewhitegirlEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited all round
Vote Placed by greatkitteh 1 year ago
greatkitteh
AussiewhitegirlEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: FFS
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
AussiewhitegirlEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Full forfeit. Con had the sole arguments.
Vote Placed by Yassine 1 year ago
Yassine
AussiewhitegirlEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: 1. Conduct: FF. => Con. // 2. Arguments: Pro presented none as opposed to Con. => Con. // 3. Sources: Pro presented none as opposed to Con. => Con.
Vote Placed by Lexus 1 year ago
Lexus
AussiewhitegirlEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF and con actually made a proper case