The Instigator
BluepointSEO
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Ragnar
Con (against)
Winning
20 Points

Search Engine Optimisation

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Ragnar
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/21/2013 Category: Technology
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 807 times Debate No: 42756
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)

 

BluepointSEO

Pro

Is it Okay to create landing pages in SEO that are tailored for particular keywords? For example this page is tailored for the keywords SEO Prices:

http://www.bluepointseo.co.uk...

My thoughts are it is Okay to create landing pages targeted at keywords providing they"re offering useful information as to what the searcher Googled or Binged for example.

Obviously, it"s not Okay to create a page that advertises clothes and display a page about dirty mags instead to a searcher.
Ragnar

Con

I accept.

As we currently only have an assertion, I await my opponent's first argument.
Debate Round No. 1
BluepointSEO

Pro

BluepointSEO forfeited this round.
Ragnar

Con

Random landing pages only clutters users, delaying their access to what they seek. This is more problematic when there exist real pages, offering the actual thing searched for.

It would be like if books about dogs were popular, so you go out and sell a book titled dogs, and the content is merely telling them what actual books about dogs there are elsewhere.
Debate Round No. 2
BluepointSEO

Pro

BluepointSEO forfeited this round.
Ragnar

Con

There you have it. Not even the paid representative of a company, could find any argument which could claim such morally rehensible tactics from a search engine are tolerable.

I do admit to having only accepted this debate, to remove the spam from the debate listing.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by iamanatheistandthisiswhy 3 years ago
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
BluepointSEORagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Spam and forfeit.
Vote Placed by bsh1 3 years ago
bsh1
BluepointSEORagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by InfiniteBears 3 years ago
InfiniteBears
BluepointSEORagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: didn't forfeit
Vote Placed by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
BluepointSEORagnarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF