The Instigator
kailey1212
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
AgnosticRadar
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

Security rules are in set to insure security, but are often not followed

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
AgnosticRadar
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/27/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 309 times Debate No: 51042
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

kailey1212

Pro

Why would you have rules in place if you did not use them?

Terrorist attacks are going to happen and no one can stop them, forever. Terrorists don"t have to take a plane to have an attack.

Everyone is going to break a rule at some point.
AgnosticRadar

Con

Thank you for this opportunity.

Although there is rule violations, the rule and regulations still do a lot to protect us. It may seem like they don't work, but every day these rules stop evil people killing innocent civilians. Although it is true that terrorist attacks happen every day, but you are wrong in your argument. These rules stop a lot of the attacks, but not all.
Debate Round No. 1
kailey1212

Pro

kailey1212 forfeited this round.
AgnosticRadar

Con

Due to the fact that she forfeited, I should be awarded the points. VOTE CON
Debate Round No. 2
kailey1212

Pro

kailey1212 forfeited this round.
AgnosticRadar

Con

Another forfeit from my opponent. This gives you even more reason to vote for me. Thanks everyone! VOTE CON!
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
kailey1212AgnosticRadarTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro never made an argument for the latter half of the resolution (but are often not followed), and thus fails to meet the BoP. I think Con successfully rebutted the other part of Pro's argument, too. Conduct to Con for Pro's forfeits.