Seeking a discussion rather than a debate regarding the existince of reality.
Debate Rounds (3)
I am fairly convinced reality does exist however, It is conceivable the inverse may be suggested as well. Rather than assert that reality is indeed a robust model of utility, I desire to discuss a method of substantiating that reality exists or that reality may not exist.
1 the kinda person u r discussing with
2 ur own and the other person's intellect
3 the most important point is to scrutinize a decoy.
mostly, in a discussion or in a debate, one would contradict to the existing reality
moreover this world has far much more number of talkers than the listeners
loveneet_bangar forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited, Pro wins.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.