The Instigator
sukalp
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
MrCarroll
Pro (for)
Winning
12 Points

Sensible perception can be considered as an intrinsically true representation of the world.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/16/2011 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 838 times Debate No: 15976
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

sukalp

Con

Topic : Sensible perception can be considered as an intrinsically true representation of the world.

My Stance: CON

Debate will start from the next round.
MrCarroll

Pro

Alright, I'm ready. Be sure to go over definitions. Have fun, sir.
Debate Round No. 1
sukalp

Con

sukalp forfeited this round.
MrCarroll

Pro

I consider sensible perception as an intrinsically true representation of the world, therefore, I win.

This wasn't actually going to be my argument, but since my opponent's account is sadly shut down, there's no point in arguing anything.
Debate Round No. 2
sukalp

Con

sukalp forfeited this round.
MrCarroll

Pro

Not much to say...
Debate Round No. 3
sukalp

Con

sukalp forfeited this round.
MrCarroll

Pro

Vote pro.
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Puck 6 years ago
Puck
Naive realism?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
sukalpMrCarrollTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by quarterexchange 6 years ago
quarterexchange
sukalpMrCarrollTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: forfeit
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 6 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
sukalpMrCarrollTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit.