The Instigator
Jiya_Tempah
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
lannan13
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points

Sexism

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
lannan13
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/12/2012 Category: Society
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 3,720 times Debate No: 26186
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

Jiya_Tempah

Con

there are certain jobs that should be done by men and certain jobs that should be done bye women....
agree or disagree?
lannan13

Pro

Basicly as Pro I have to argue that Certain jobs have to be done by men.
Military
In the course of battle it should only be men not women, because if in battle the men would be more concered about the women's safty then killing the enemy. http://dailycaller.com...
Teacher's
In today's world women should be teachers vs. men. Women have the tendency to be gentler then men when teaching.
Debate Round No. 1
Jiya_Tempah

Con

ok...
So your saying there are jobs than women wont do because they are protected by men. So why cant women protect men and why does it have to be the other way round? men can be teachers and they are and in which they are doing a great job! By saying that a man cannot do something a women can is sexist. When someone says that men are good builders and women just are not strong enough it means that they are saying men are the strongest sex. This is discrimination towards women. It is sexist and just not right. Inside all of us are equal. A women can do anything a man can if they just try and have the right tools to do it.

That's all. thank you. overall, you did make a good point. I can see where you are coming from but please understand where I am coming from. We should all be equal. Do you agree with me yet?
lannan13

Pro

That's today's world. Men in the military are gentlemen and they are looking out for the women's welfare and if they're in danger that's their number one priority. I do agree all are equal, but something are better left to the men like in the field of battle.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Jiya_Tempah 4 years ago
Jiya_Tempah
Hey please vote for me. Itss my first time on here and all i want is to prove my point. PLzz
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by baggins 4 years ago
baggins
Jiya_Tempahlannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side deserves any vote.
Vote Placed by RyuuKyuzo 4 years ago
RyuuKyuzo
Jiya_Tempahlannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I can't say I was particularly convinced by anyone. Con had a number of grammar/spelling issues and Pro had sources, so points to Pro in that respect.
Vote Placed by AlwaysMoreThanYou 4 years ago
AlwaysMoreThanYou
Jiya_Tempahlannan13Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side made tremendous arguments. I was marginally more convinced by Con's huge font-ed paragraph than Pro's three lines of rebuttal. Pro used a source that was relevant, so sources.