Should Abortion be Legal?
Debate Rounds (5)
I am arguing the side of pro-choice. I chose this for the following reasons:
(1)Condoms and birth control do not always work, so abortions need to be a backup plan. Although abstentions is a safe method of not becoming pregnant, it is very unlikely that most people will follow this advice.
(2)(3)Rape is a big issue. Being pregnant with your attackers baby can be very damaging mentally. Even if you give this baby up for adoption, you will still have to go through the pain of giving birth. Rape victims having abortions is pretty rare, but it still should be available.
(4)Giving birth is costly. Young women who don't make that much money can't afford to pay the medical bill. Abortions are much cheaper.
Yes, I do think that killing BABIES should be illegal. But, babies and fetuses are two very different things. I do not condone aborting a baby after the the time period in which it would be able to survive on its own.
(1)Killing fetuses is nothing like killing a living, breathing child. The fetus is too young to be considered a person.
Plus, it should always be the mother's choice what she does with her body. The fetus is made up of her body. If she makes it, she should be allowed to kill it.
On another note: why did you give a link to a pro-life website?
Saying that a person that is asleep doesn't have sentience is like saying that a person with their eyes closed is permanently blind.
Yes, as soon as a baby is born, it stops being part of the mother. The umbilical cord is separated at birth, so the baby stops relying on the mother for food. Therefore, it isn't a part of her anymore
Also, would you make it so that every female has to become pregnant whenever she ovulates because that egg has the potential to be human?
(1)Yes, a baby is part of the mother. I agree that after the child has developed enough inside the womb to be able to survive outside, it shouldn't not be killed. But, when the baby is nothing more than a sack of flesh, it should be the mother's choice.
I clearly stated that after a baby is able to survive out of the mother, it should not be killed. A newborn child has a much higher mental capacity than a fetus.
When a baby is born, it bonds with the mother and immediately starts growing mentally. A fetus cannot do either.
1. "When a baby is born, it bonds with the mother and immediately starts growing mentally. A fetus cannot do either."
A fetus is definitely growing mentally in the womb; after all this is when the brain is forming. And being able to bond with the mother is a foolish prerequisite for moral worth.
I was well aware that you believe that a newborn child is not just a sack of flesh. The point in my previous argument was to show an inconsistency in your logic. Now you defend this by saying that this is when the fetus begins to grow towards sentience and grow mentally, and therefore has the right to live. But ironically this is the exact same line of reasoning which validates my position: the fetus is growing mentally, after all this is when the brain is forming. It is only just a matter of time.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by rextr05 9 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||7|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro gives many opinions & fails to reco what the word, "sentient" means. He assumes it's very much like the word 'conscious.' & he misspells the word conscious. Pro's statement of, "The fetus is made up of her body. If she makes it, she should be allowed to kill it," shows his lack of knowledge re a fetus. It is certainly not made up of her body. A fetus is a separate entity that is supported by the mother. I must ask pro where he was during biology class. & pro's source for this conclusion, never states anything about this conclusion of being made up of her body. It seems that the lack of knowledge re a fetus & the biology thereof, lost you this debate. Pro's argument lacks credible facts, it's all opinion with the references not applicable to your opinions. You need facts included in your argument, not just sources copy & pasted. You must explain their content to bolster your argument. Completely unprofessional & a bad example of debating skills.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.