The Instigator
John95
Con (against)
Losing
4 Points
The Contender
jp_porwisz10
Pro (for)
Winning
6 Points

Should Barack Obama be impeached?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
jp_porwisz10
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/15/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,010 times Debate No: 54740
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

John95

Con

Barack Obama should not be impeached. He is just doing the best with what he has been given.
jp_porwisz10

Pro

I accept the debate
Debate Round No. 1
John95

Con

While some people believe that our 44th president should be impeached, that is a false attitude to take. The problems that the Obama Administration is trying to deal with go back a long way.
jp_porwisz10

Pro

Everyone blames Bush, but here is some cold, hard facts. From Washington to Bush, the debt has been 6.4 Trillin Dollars. The debt from Obama ALONE? 6.5 trillion. Obama is spending or money on worthless things. What does Obama doe in the White House? He plays Golf and eats chocolate.

VOTE CON!!!
Debate Round No. 2
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by jp_porwisz10 3 years ago
jp_porwisz10
Sorry about my bad grammer 😐
Posted by John95 3 years ago
John95
During the Civil War, which was originally fought over states' rights, our 16th President, Abraham Lincoln, suspended the writ of habeas corpus, a legal doctrine that, translated from Latin, means "bring the body." Although Abraham Lincoln was a good president overall, he introduced changes into our government that led up to practically everything that is wrong with the government of the United States, including the NSA and Edward Snowden. Thus, it cannot be justified that Barack Obama should be impeached.
Posted by yomama12 3 years ago
yomama12
too little info on this topic. I voter for other guy, jp.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by DarthKirones 3 years ago
DarthKirones
John95jp_porwisz10Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: I wish this was more organized and more detailed. At least pro gave somewhat of a reason that Obama should be impeached. This was a very lackluster debate.
Vote Placed by Gs325jcbd 3 years ago
Gs325jcbd
John95jp_porwisz10Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didnt give valid reasons why Barack Obama should notbe impeached. Nor did the pro. This was a poorly organized and answered debate. This was so bad i dont even know who to vote for.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 3 years ago
bladerunner060
John95jp_porwisz10Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: This is a tough one. Con has presumptive BoP, but in a case like this where there isn't even a thing TO impeach that's been posited, it basically shifts over to Pro. I think had Pro offered any legitimate reason for impeachment, that might have won him the day on BoP grounds, but he never did. So arguments to Con. S&G, Sources, and Conduct were equal enough. As always, happy to clarify this RFD.