The Instigator
Tunjay
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
james3hayes
Pro (for)
Winning
16 Points

Should Call of Duty be band

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
james3hayes
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/19/2015 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 551 times Debate No: 70337
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (4)
Votes (4)

 

Tunjay

Con

I don't think call of duty be band becasue it is really good for people who wants to be in army and it is really fun game
james3hayes

Pro

For a start it is not "band" it is banned.

Now, you said it's really good for people who want to be in the army... I don't know if you understand how much that undermines all of the soldiers out risking their lives right now. By merely suggesting that actual conflict is in anyway similar to call of duty you prove your ignorance towards what conflict really consists of. That is not to say I do as I am no soldier, but I can tell you now it's a fair amount more than anyone suggesting Call Of Duty helps those preparing or wanting to join the armed forces. Call of Duty encourages the idea of conflict being some easy going stroll in the park. The reason so many people disprove of such games is because of the impact it has on younger generations, yourself being a prime example. Now that's not to say it should be BANNED ( Not band) but shouldn't be taken as a literal representation of true conflict.
Debate Round No. 1
Tunjay

Con

I know but if you are good in a video game you are going to be same in the real life is that not right
james3hayes

Pro

No that's not remotely right! Because you can twidle your thumbs on a controller does not mean that you are capable of firing a weapon effectively whilst yourself taking fire and being under extreme stress!
Debate Round No. 2
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by bluesteel 2 years ago
bluesteel
======================================================================
>Reported vote: taburkasaurusrex // Moderator action: removed<

7 points to Pro. {RFD = Reasons for voting decision: The con didn't know what he was even talking about. It takes more than having video game experience to know what to do in the Army.}

[*Reason for removal*] Failure to explain S&G, conduct, and sources votes.
======================================================================
Posted by bluesteel 2 years ago
bluesteel
======================================================================
>Reported vote: 2001bhu // Moderator action: removed<

7 points to Pro. {RFD = Reasons for voting decision: This is proof of a failed education system.}

[*Reason for removal*] Failure to explain conduct, S&G, arguments, and sources votes. Also, voters should refrain from being explicitly rude to the debaters in their RFDs.
======================================================================
Posted by Jonnykelly 2 years ago
Jonnykelly
Pro didn't even have to say anything and he still could have won.
Posted by 2001bhu 2 years ago
2001bhu
pro has won
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by CASmnl42 2 years ago
CASmnl42
Tunjayjames3hayesTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Topic: was anybody suggesting it should be? Conduct: everyone stayed civil Spelling: "band" Argument: only Pro made any attempt at cogent reasoning No sources
Vote Placed by Jingle_Bombs 2 years ago
Jingle_Bombs
Tunjayjames3hayesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I would like to be on record as saying that campers, no-scope snipers, care packages, and hordes of idiots running around with knives is NOT good for the army.
Vote Placed by Acarr130 2 years ago
Acarr130
Tunjayjames3hayesTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had better arguments, let alone the only good argument. Grammar for pro, hands down. Nether had sources. Conduct for pro is just a given.
Vote Placed by Hylian_3000 2 years ago
Hylian_3000
Tunjayjames3hayesTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: Both had good conduct. S&G: Pro wins this because Con misspelled the topic. Arguments: Both had speculation and opinions for arguments, but Con's claims did not make sense. Pro at least made a bit of sense, thus Pro wins arguments. Sources: No sources used.