The Instigator
PastorJoshua
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Bitz
Con (against)
Winning
33 Points

Should Curches Use Homotesticular Shock Treatment to Cure Homosexuality?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/6/2008 Category: Society
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,261 times Debate No: 3532
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (11)

 

PastorJoshua

Pro

As a devout christian, It seems quite clear that Homosexuality has become a big problem, even in my Christian community. If Jesus could only see how low society has fallen...

So here is my solution: Homotesticular Shock treatment Therapy.

Here are the definitions put forth.

Homotesticles- A homersexual's testicles.
Homotesticular- Relating to a Homersexual's testicles.
Homotesticular Shock Treatment Therapy - The act of administering large amounts of electrical charge to a homersexuals testicles in hope that he will change his deviant ways.

I think this treatment should be used in every Church. The Bible is quite clear in it's view on homersexuality.

This nation was founded as a Christian nation, and homersexuality needs to go,
praise the sweet name of JESUS!
Bitz

Con

YES I KNOW THAT THIS IS A JOKE, YES I KNOW THIS IS OBVIOUSLY SATIRE!

Very well, I will accept my opponents definitions relating to a homosexuals testicles for the sake of argument.

Since my opponent has failed the define what he means by "Curing Homosexuality" I will define it. I define curing homosexuality as changing ones sexual preference from homosexual preference to a different sexual preference.

First and foremost, there is no evidence whatsoever that testicular shock treatment therapy can cure homosexuality. My opponent could argue, that with enough electrical current, the homosexual's testicles would be completely dysfunctional, and thus he would not be able to have homosexual sex, however this is not tantamount to curing homosexuality because he would not change preference in his sexuality, He would simply not be able to perform with his preferred sex. My opponent may counter that Jesus teaches that it is better to cut off a part of your body rather than let him sin, However I have a better alternative.

We simply kill them, just like it says in the book of leviticus.
Debate Round No. 1
PastorJoshua

Pro

PastorJoshua forfeited this round.
Bitz

Con

It seems that our pastor is no longer with us. Extend all arguments including my resolution that homosexuals should be put to death, instead of undergoing testicular-shock treatment.
Debate Round No. 2
PastorJoshua

Pro

PastorJoshua forfeited this round.
Bitz

Con

Not really sure what to type in this box considering there really is no case from pro for me to debate....
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Hard_Muscle_Guy_30 3 years ago
Hard_Muscle_Guy_30
yes
Posted by SexyLatina 9 years ago
SexyLatina
Someone was on this site, at 10 last night, making an account for the sole purpose of voting badly. Seems kinda pointless and contrary.
Posted by THEmanlyDEBATER2 9 years ago
THEmanlyDEBATER2
WE SHOULDN'T KILL ANYBODY AS THAT'S MORALLY EVIL. I'M VOTING PRO.
Posted by Rob1Billion 9 years ago
Rob1Billion
pastor-psychopath's account has been closed... what a surprise!
11 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by bexy_kelly 9 years ago
bexy_kelly
PastorJoshuaBitzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by MaxHayslip 9 years ago
MaxHayslip
PastorJoshuaBitzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by SexyLatina 9 years ago
SexyLatina
PastorJoshuaBitzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Oolon_Colluphid 9 years ago
Oolon_Colluphid
PastorJoshuaBitzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Mangani 9 years ago
Mangani
PastorJoshuaBitzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by HoosierPapi 9 years ago
HoosierPapi
PastorJoshuaBitzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by eweb53 9 years ago
eweb53
PastorJoshuaBitzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Bitz 9 years ago
Bitz
PastorJoshuaBitzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by HadenQuinlan 9 years ago
HadenQuinlan
PastorJoshuaBitzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by brittwaller 9 years ago
brittwaller
PastorJoshuaBitzTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03