Should Department of Education reduce the requirements of social studies?
Debate Rounds (3)
As Denise Brown noted, "Studying social studies helps students figure out their role in society as well as their place in history. By studying the past, students learn how institutions, traditions and ideals change as society modernizes. They also learn how cause and effect influence relationships between individuals, groups and nations. As students mature, the study of history gives students the chance to develop their research skills and the ability to think critically."
Your argument was based on your own opinion to how you feel about the primary concern on public education. I do believe you are missing my point on my round one statement. I try to bring up a point on the benefits of having social studies; it improves for students to build up their ideals in our civilization. In addition, you assumed that the demand of math and science can somewhat justify the decision that it is more important than social studies. I never compared for social studies to be better than math or science. I only argue for social studies to be as important as language arts, math and science for the general requirement in public education. I am for language arts, social studies, math and science to be equally important.
To decrease the yearly requirement of social studies can harm the values for our future generations.
According to National Curriculum Standards for Social Studies, "Within the school program, social studies provides coordinated, systematic study drawing upon such disciplines as anthropology, archaeology, economics, geography, history, law, philosophy, political science, psychology, religion, and sociology, as well as appropriate content from the humanities, mathematics, and natural sciences. The primary purpose of social studies is to help young people make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world."
That quote can bring some good points that social studies can provide the different type of social sciences. Economics can one of the social sciences that promote the important forms of math. For a person to assume that social studies have no math or science would be quite silly. All of the basically social studies programs can offer many courses for all students to be prepared for the future. To learn from social studies can help them to develop their own thinking skills, which can be a huge benefit to our future generations.
However, our public schools is in need for change to apply more math and more science.
We need to encourage students, not keep them stuck.
My point is more reasonable and will not cause any harm to anyone. I support to keep the current circumstance the way it is.
Please vote no because social studies can become a benefit. By reducing the requirements of social studies, it can be harmful to our future generations. Everyone needs to realize that social studies could help our students to develop values on social matters.
I am concern for the future.
Math and science are the future for our children.
Vote yes because our current circumstance need to be updated.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.