Should High Schools with a JROTC Program be required to take one year of JROTC?
Debate Rounds (3)
Except in times of war when the draft is in effect, our nation relies on an all volunteer military. It is better that way. Besides, many people have objection to military service for religious or moral reasons.
For what purpose should these people be forced to lay aside their principles?
To say that JROTC is not a recruiting service is disingenuous at best, since in 1999 the Commander of the United States Army Cadet Command ordered that it be used for that purpose:
"JROTC SAI and AI will:
a. Actively assist cadets who want to enlist in the military. Emphasize service in the U.S. Army (all components).
b. Facilitate recruiter access to cadets in JROTC program and to the entire student body.
c. Encourage college bound cadets to enroll in SROTC.
d. Work closely with High School guidance counselors to sell the Army story..." 
Furthermore, the JROTC cadets have a chain of command which includes the Secretary of Defense, and the President of the United States. 
Neither compulsory service in the Armed Forces, or their recruiting and propaganda programs can be required consistent with the Constitution.
1. http://www.projectyano.org... (Page 3).
Yes recruiters come and go but it's YOUR decision if your going in to the military or not; and the chain of command is meant to help you learn to keep track of politics and the govt, again JROTC is a student/ cadet run program, the instructors mostly insure your going in a good direction.
Let us review.
My opponent still claims JROTC is not a recruiting program, although JROTC instructors have been ordered to facilitate recruiter access not only to the cadets, but the entire student body, and to enlist other school employees to help "sell the Army story". In fact, he ignored those two points.
Keeping track of politics and government can certainly be done without subjugating the students in the direct chain of command of the Secretary of Defense and the President. Furthermore, my opponent has not explained why those with religious and moral objections to such a service should be mandated to join.
JROTC is NOT cadet run, I have shown that this is a program administered directly by the Defense Department.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by daem0n 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments: Pro never actually presents a reason to require students to take JROTC. Con says students can get the benefits of JROTC (whatever they are) elsewhere, without sacrificing their religious and moral principles. Sources: only Con cites any.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.