Should Hillary Clinton be arrested
Debate Rounds (3)
gavin8884 forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 10 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: In this debate, the Burden of Proof lays with Pro since he is arguing from a procecuting side of Hilary Clinton. Pro eventually argues that she should be arrested due to the email scandle. Con, however, properly refutes this argument by showing that Hilary Clinton has stood trial and multiple ones at that. The prosecuting side has yet to find any new evidence against her or have found any charges. Without any of this then she cannot be arrested for a crime that she hasn't been found guilty for. Pro had forfeited round three, so without any rebuttals of Con's arguments, I have to give the arguments points to Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.