The Instigator
ukvoltaire
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
HarryLewis1234
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Should History be compulsory for GCSE?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
ukvoltaire
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/6/2015 Category: Education
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 602 times Debate No: 72998
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (11)
Votes (1)

 

ukvoltaire

Pro

History should be allowed to be compulsory for GCSE. I have many reasons for this. If History is compulsory then that mean everyone will know the history of Britain fully and will be full aware of what is happening in the world. History helps us to understand the word more and realise how lucky we are as well as making us think deep about this. History being compulsory means that we can learn more about World War 1 and 2. This is why we should make History compulsory for GSCE. Please understand.
HarryLewis1234

Con

I think History should not be compulsory because History is really bad. Try beating that ukvoltaire. :-)
Debate Round No. 1
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by ColeTrain 1 year ago
ColeTrain
@ukvoltaire, you're welcome. :)
Posted by ukvoltaire 1 year ago
ukvoltaire
Thank you ColeTrain for voting for me. I was thinking you will vote for Harry not me. Thanks anyway.
Posted by ukvoltaire 1 year ago
ukvoltaire
Someone vote?
Posted by ukvoltaire 1 year ago
ukvoltaire
Klaus, don't you me Ukvoltaire(me) instead of I.
Posted by Klaus_905 1 year ago
Klaus_905
ColeTrain I think I will win. Look at what HarryLewis1234 said.
Posted by ColeTrain 1 year ago
ColeTrain
Lol. We'll see how this goes.
@HarryLewis1234 Look over my comments, it's an easy win if you base arguments off of that. :)
Posted by HarryLewis1234 1 year ago
HarryLewis1234
I Have accepted
Posted by usernamesareannoying 1 year ago
usernamesareannoying
increase the character limit and I will accept
Posted by ColeTrain 1 year ago
ColeTrain
I know you mean the subject history, but you need to specify which era of history to which you are referring. Leaving it as subjective as "history" is indeterminable. We could either be discussing the Berlin Wall or when Hannibal crossed the Alps. Clarification is essential to the success and acceptance of such a disputable resolution. Simply narrowing down the notion to a certain era will greatly benefit the debate and competitors.
Posted by ukvoltaire 1 year ago
ukvoltaire
ColeTrain, I mean the subject History.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by ColeTrain 1 year ago
ColeTrain
ukvoltaireHarryLewis1234Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: The only argument provided came from Pro.