The Instigator
Pro (for)
3 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Should History be compulsory for GCSE?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/6/2015 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 897 times Debate No: 72998
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (11)
Votes (1)




History should be allowed to be compulsory for GCSE. I have many reasons for this. If History is compulsory then that mean everyone will know the history of Britain fully and will be full aware of what is happening in the world. History helps us to understand the word more and realise how lucky we are as well as making us think deep about this. History being compulsory means that we can learn more about World War 1 and 2. This is why we should make History compulsory for GSCE. Please understand.


I think History should not be compulsory because History is really bad. Try beating that ukvoltaire. :-)
Debate Round No. 1
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by ColeTrain 3 years ago
@ukvoltaire, you're welcome. :)
Posted by ukvoltaire 3 years ago
Thank you ColeTrain for voting for me. I was thinking you will vote for Harry not me. Thanks anyway.
Posted by ukvoltaire 3 years ago
Someone vote?
Posted by ukvoltaire 3 years ago
Klaus, don't you me Ukvoltaire(me) instead of I.
Posted by Klaus_905 3 years ago
ColeTrain I think I will win. Look at what HarryLewis1234 said.
Posted by ColeTrain 3 years ago
Lol. We'll see how this goes.
@HarryLewis1234 Look over my comments, it's an easy win if you base arguments off of that. :)
Posted by HarryLewis1234 3 years ago
I Have accepted
Posted by usernamesareannoying 3 years ago
increase the character limit and I will accept
Posted by ColeTrain 3 years ago
I know you mean the subject history, but you need to specify which era of history to which you are referring. Leaving it as subjective as "history" is indeterminable. We could either be discussing the Berlin Wall or when Hannibal crossed the Alps. Clarification is essential to the success and acceptance of such a disputable resolution. Simply narrowing down the notion to a certain era will greatly benefit the debate and competitors.
Posted by ukvoltaire 3 years ago
ColeTrain, I mean the subject History.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by ColeTrain 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: The only argument provided came from Pro.