The Instigator
coolaaronwu
Pro (for)
Winning
10 Points
The Contender
Redscrap101
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points

Should Homeless People Be Helped?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
coolaaronwu
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/14/2014 Category: People
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,514 times Debate No: 43934
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

coolaaronwu

Pro

Yes, because homeless people have no place to live. And I saw a person that needs food, so I fed him a chicken nugget. Also homeless people need a place to live. We need to give them homes to live in. They also need food and water. Plus if we do not feed these people they would die and the population would drop more than usual.
Redscrap101

Con

I wish I could agree with you on that, however homeless people are just expecting you feel sorry for them and make you care for them. I once asked a homeless man, "are you gonna bother trying a get a job." He a gave me a face a said "f*** it."
That was the last time I ever helped a homeless person.
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
Con, I would have said the same thing. That's a super rude thing to ask.
Posted by LAZARUS77 3 years ago
LAZARUS77
"a said "f*** it."" lol
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
coolaaronwuRedscrap101Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro gave reasons why the homeless need to be helped that weren't refuted.
Vote Placed by TheLastMan 3 years ago
TheLastMan
coolaaronwuRedscrap101Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made some grammatical mistakes. Both of them were focusing on their personal opinions. Con was presenting an unwarranted assumption. But, Pro made a point beyond his opinion.
Vote Placed by whiteflame 3 years ago
whiteflame
coolaaronwuRedscrap101Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Both debaters need to spend less time telling their personal stories of interacting with homeless people and focus on the topic at hand - your individual experiences aren't arguments. But as Pro was the only one who had actual argumentation that went beyond the story he provided, he wins this very short debate.
Vote Placed by TheAntidoter 3 years ago
TheAntidoter
coolaaronwuRedscrap101Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: f*ck homeless people jk