The Instigator
yish
Pro (for)
Tied
3 Points
The Contender
fixedwounds
Con (against)
Tied
3 Points

Should Iran have its nuecluer right taken away

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/17/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 253 times Debate No: 91380
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

yish

Pro

If Iran gets nuecluer bombs we will go kablooie. If they do get there nuclear rights taken away then the world won't need to go into World War III.
fixedwounds

Con

Actually it's unfair for a country to have nuclear weapons and another who is receiving such hatred from big countries like America and the Middle East. We do realize that Iran attempted many crimes towards humanity. But taking away it's right from using nuclear weapons and letting others use the nuclear weapons is totally unfair. If we will pull away someone's right then we should pull away everyone's right!
Debate Round No. 1
yish

Pro

So let's let Isis bomb us because we bombed them.You realize how stupid that is
fixedwounds

Con

So you expect from them to sit down and watch you kill their people and be all happy about it? plus! who brought up ISIS? they don't use nuclear weapons, because they are AMERICANS! and ISIS is not our topic. don't go off topic because you have nothing to reply with
Debate Round No. 2
yish

Pro

Giving Iran nukes is like giving Isis nukes
fixedwounds

Con

then giving the USA nuclear weapons is like giving the KKK nuclear weapons. in each and every country there is the good and the bad, we have to give the good people the control over the weapons so the bad people won't be able to reach for it. you must use your mind before accusing a whole country for actions of a minority.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by yish 1 year ago
yish
Giving Iran nukes is like committing suicide
Posted by yish 1 year ago
yish
I know is Isis isn't Iran but they both kill people
Posted by KingsleyL 1 year ago
KingsleyL
The pro side has done very little research. ISIS is not in Iran, iSIS is in Western Iraq and Syria. Iran most likely wants nukes for a MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) situation to avoid any actual conflict with NATO countries. NATO countries have a reputation of destroying and exploiting the Middle East and Iran knows that it is a future target.
Posted by yish 1 year ago
yish
By the way I a different debate you said America has let in imagrints I wrote back "but not illegal"
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by BenD 1 year ago
BenD
yishfixedwoundsTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: There was very little refutation in this round. I am giving Pro my vote for his arguments because Con's entire position rests on Iran HAVING a right to have nukes. If there is no right to nukes, your position falls apart. Also, Con never refuted Pro's first argument of national security.
Vote Placed by DebaterGood 1 year ago
DebaterGood
yishfixedwoundsTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments go to Con because arguments were rebutted nicely.