Should Marijuana be legalized for recreational use?
Debate Rounds (3)
Contention 1: Legalization increases violence
The DEA has connected the link between Marijuana and terrorist activities. Legalization will only increase it as the demand will go up while the Cartels will use violence to keep the supply down. Here is a quote from the DEA regarding this issue, "The bombers swapped hashish and ecstasy for the 440 pounds of dynamite used in the blasts, which killed 191 people and injured more than 1,400 others. Money from the drugs also paid for an apartment hideout, a car, and the cell phones used to detonate the bombs." (http://www.policechiefmagazine.org...)
Donnie Marshall, Congressional subcommittee on drugs has stated that legalization will not stop violence.
Contention 2: Health Factors
I know my opponent has said that it is safer than alcohol and tobacco, but I will now give you some alarming facts. Marijuana is addictive and can increase your heart rate by a factor of 20 to 100. Smoking 1 joint is the equilivent of smoking 5 cigarettes. The 'High' fallowed by a crash that can cause fear and depression. These last forever while a 'High' will only last a few hours. (http://www.charismanews.com...)
We all know how expensive our health bills are. Well, when it comes to Marijuana in the year 2002, the ONDCP has found that the total cost of Marijuana injuries totaled over $52 billion, that's when it's illegal. Imagine if it were legal and opened up to the general population. (http://www.policechiefmagazine.org...)
The truth is inevitable, Marijuana is not what it is portrayed to be. In the countries in which Marijuana has been legalized, such as Uruguay the crime rate is far less than America. So what is to blame for the crime? Surely it could not be Cannabis .
According to my source, organized crime bosses are taking huge losses in profit since the Legalization of Marijuana.
Finally, choice is supposed to be the ultimate decider. whether or not something is safe or not is not the deciding factor. Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke and Montesquieu have said that the power is in the people. The same ideals have legalized so many other "dangerous" things. Countries need to stop trying to protect people from themselves because it is not working. How is this protecting anyone when people are being killed to protect and distribute an illegal commodity?
The kind of fear my opponent is trying to instill is the same fear that caused the harmless substance DDT to be banned world wide. The people who want Marijuana banned will make all kinds of ridiculous and erroneous correlations and hide behind the title of "Dr". Mind you not every doctor is medical and not all medical knowledge comes from doctors. Dr. Dre would not be the leading authority in breast cancer but the title seems to give the unknowing researcher a reason to believe in the merit and integrity of the person who published the work.
My opponent is once again inncorrect as I have brought up a professional source to back my marijuana will increase with legalization argument while my opponent has not.
So since my opponent has dropped a major health factor argument and has not brought up a valid source then I see no reason to not vote con. Thank you.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Cobo 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||2|
Reasons for voting decision: This debate could have been done better. Pro's initial claims were not backed up by any proof while the con's had sources. Pro actually had some great rebuttals to the Con's contentions but did not actually follow all the way through.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.