The Instigator
sana_sameja
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Balacafa
Pro (for)
Winning
9 Points

Should Mecca Reduce the amount of people exerting

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Balacafa
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/10/2015 Category: People
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 282 times Debate No: 83745
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

sana_sameja

Con

they should reduce the amount of people entering because people are dying and people are getting hurt. they go to pray not to die. My family went there and they were lost we had hope they would be found but maybe not enough and they had died in the stamped!!!
Balacafa

Pro

I accept this debate. I'd also like to highlight that I am going to be arguing the Pro position (as is evidently shown by my role) and therefore my opponent has provided arguments in my favor rather than theirs.

I await my opponent's case due to the shared BOP.
Debate Round No. 1
sana_sameja

Con

sana_sameja forfeited this round.
Balacafa

Pro

Contention 1: Innocent lives at risk

Recently, 244 people were killed in Mecca due to a huge stampede of people [1]. Without reductions in people entering Mecca, we risk the lives of more innocents live these people.

Sources

[1] http://www.telegraph.co.uk...
Debate Round No. 2
sana_sameja

Con

sana_sameja forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
sana_sameja

Con

sana_sameja forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
sana_sameja

Con

sana_sameja forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
sana_samejaBalacafaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by Bob13 1 year ago
Bob13
sana_samejaBalacafaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited all rounds.
Vote Placed by TheResistance 1 year ago
TheResistance
sana_samejaBalacafaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF by Con Con posted arguments that were for Pro Pro had a strong contention that Con didn't even hit Pro wins