Should NATO put combat troops in Ukraine
Debate Rounds (3)
You may start right away, or use first round as acceptance only, I don't mind it.
War is currently between Russia and Ukraine. Only way for it to expand further is for other countries to take sides.
Even if every other country in the world was at war, as longs as no NATO's countries are attacked, NATO has no right to interfere.
Reason why not just WW II, but every other international war happened is because some rulers wanted more control.
Maybe you care about safety, but none Russian, US or EU leaders do. What they care about is oil and gas. And that is what this war is all about.
There is no victim and bully here. There is only two sides fighting for resources.
People in every nation at war believe their reasons for killing other nation's people are pure and just. The right thing to do for people in US is to make sure their troops are home. Right thing for Russian people is to make sure their troops are at home; Let's give them example, not war.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Rhodesia79 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con had the more convincing argument. Everything else was tied.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.