The Instigator
Lukeirwin46
Pro (for)
Losing
4 Points
The Contender
RoyalFlush100
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

Should Obama be kick out of offers

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
RoyalFlush100
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/8/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 491 times Debate No: 74984
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

Lukeirwin46

Pro

Obama did nuthing for owere cuntry. He made obama cair that hert michigen famlies Im one of them. He is also got rid of nasas space man traval no amariken ben to space for 7 years becuas of him were are sufring. All obama cars about is munny He is hearting our millitary we youst to be the best now were not. He is trying to get rid of ouwer millitary.
http://www.westernjournalism.com...
http://www.theblaze.com...
http://www.westernjournalism.com...
RoyalFlush100

Con

At this point, the only way Obama could be "kicked out of office" is if he is impeached, which is Pro's BOP to prove.

For an American president to be impeached, they must commit "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors" (1)

All Pro is asserting is that Obama created Obamacare, shrank NASA, and shrinking the military. None of these are impeachable offenses. However, Pro does assert Obama loves money, which could lead way to bribery, but nothing is done to prove that.

Therefore, as Pro has failed to prove Obama should be impeached, I win.

1-http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 1
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by doctorcsss 2 years ago
doctorcsss
RRD: I went into the debate with a neutral opinion.

Conduct- both had fine conduct; neither was harsh with the other and both seemed civil enough.

Spelling and Grammar- Pro's was atrocious. Quite humourous, but really, really bad, "nuthing for owere cuntry... cair that hert michigen....no amariken ben to space for 7 years becuas of him..." And so it continues. It gave me a real laugh, but these point definitely go to Con.

Sources- Pro actually used multiple sources, which are more reliable than a single Wikipedia article, so these points go to Pro.

More convincing points- Neither side really brought up any points. Pro mentioned a few reasons like overspending and cutting NASA, but these to not warrant impeachment. Con mentions this, but does not really elaborate enough or back up his assertions. I will still give these points to Con, because he at least spoke in coherent language and refuted Pro's statements.

So in conclusion, Pro needs to transition out of Klingon and into Humanspeak. He also needs to bring up relevant points that justify impeachment rather than just negative aspects of Obama's presidency. Con did a good job of sticking to the topic, but could elaborate more and use better sources. So very humours debate, I got a good ab workout trying to decipher it, but both sides could use some help.
Posted by RoyalFlush100 2 years ago
RoyalFlush100
@Lukeirwin46 It was cited in the Wikipedia article. Here's the link it was cited too: https://www.law.cornell.edu...

Those are the only ways a president can be impeached.
Posted by Lukeirwin46 2 years ago
Lukeirwin46
.org is not a good sores getting information can be rotten by anyone is suggest .gov
Posted by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
I doubt anyone can refute this case, given the unique writing style.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by TBSmothers 2 years ago
TBSmothers
Lukeirwin46RoyalFlush100Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:25 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct- con I voted con for conduct because the pro's arguments appeared to be very opinionated. Spelling/grammar-con Con had much better grammar/spelling than pro did which is quite evident by reading any of pro's sentences. Argument-con Although The pro did put up some arguments for why obama should be removed from office such as? He is also got rid of nasas space man traval?which were believable until the con listed the only reasons how a president can be impeached which were ?treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors?. For this reason the cons argument was stronger. REliable sources- pro due to the fact that the con used wikipedia which is not very reliable i give this point to the pro
Vote Placed by taburkasaurusrex 2 years ago
taburkasaurusrex
Lukeirwin46RoyalFlush100Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:22 
Reasons for voting decision: I could barely understand pro's arguements and he didn't make much sense to be honest.