Should "ObamaCare" be repealed?
Debate Rounds (3)
-It will increase unemployment rates. BAD
-It will increase the Government's debt. BAD
-It will increase taxes. BAD
-It will make Americans more dependent on the government. BAD
PPACA skeptics believe that "ObamaCare" would result in a loss of jobs. This however is a false statement. With an increase of patients attending hospitals, employment numbers would in fact ***INCREASE due to a demand in doctors, nurses, pediatricians etc. The PPACA is a great opportunity for the people of America take advantage of vacant jobs, as well as receive proper and cost effective medical treatment.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act should not be repealed, but rather embraced as a necessity to American people as it will supply more job opportunities, as well as ensure citizens cost effective medical relief.
Remember when the President promised that Obamacare would reduce the cost of health insurance? "Under [our] plan, if you like your current health insurance, nothing changes, except your costs will go down by as much as $2,500 per year," said Obama in 2008. The law, like Romneycare in Massachusetts, would magically eliminate the mythical "free-rider problem" by massively subsidizing health spending for the lower middle class.
Well, the Office of the Actuary in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently put out its annual projections of national health care spending. And, contrary to the President, the actuaries find that Obamacare will dramatically increase the near-term growth rate of health care costs. In 2014, the actuaries find that growth in the net cost of health insurance will increase by nearly 14 percent, compared to 3.5% if PPACA had never passed. The growth rate of private insurance costs will rise to 9.4 percent, from 5.0 percent under prior law: an 88% increase.
"...so each person would have to pay $3203.32 in new taxes. That is a lot more than what you said."
First of all I would like to restate the fact that the PPACA is not projected to be paid out in 1 year. In my previous argument I stated that the projected cost of ObamaCare was not to exceed that of 409 billion OVER 10 years. This means that payments of $104 would take place 10 times, equalling up to $1040. Also, please take into account that not all 409 billion would be paid for by the tax payer, but corporations and industries as well.
As for unemployment issues, the healthcare sector in Canada currently employs *5% (824,600 people) of their national poplulation. The United States health and human service service sector, which is responsible for nearly 10 times the amount of people, hires a mere **64,000 people, equivalent to 0.0002% of the entire US population! That means that 760,000 more jobs are available in Canada to serve 277,000,000 less people in the healthcare sector. This is largely due to the universal health care plan that Yes Magazine says is "the best answer [society's] come up with so far." In the recent World Health Organization's ranking of world health systems, the USA placed ***37th, behind places with universal healthcare such as France, the UK, and Canada. Enacting country wide healthcare would result in a greater demand for jobs in the medical industry, as well as subsidary industries such as medicine production and delivery etc.
Also, as you stated in your first argument, ObamaCare will make Americans "more dependant on the government." This however is an invalid point. Taking advantage of rights and freedom's is not due in part of being less self-sufficient, but rather it is expected by the government. The PPACA was put in place so that people WOULD use it, for if noone did for the fear of being "more reliant on the government," then it would be an absolute waste of money. We as the people elect politicians into power to take care of issues we as a populous could not handle our selves. With that being said, shouldn't we be able to depend on these people? By not trusting and depending on our govenment, we are taking a step back in the democratic process.
The PPACA is the future of American medical care and by repealing the Act, the USA would be taking a step BACK on the journey of restoring America to its former greatness.
PopeJordan forfeited this round.
- ObamaCare will be a cost effective utility for american citizens to take advantage of.
- The PPACA will NOT largely effect the taxpayer.
- ObamaCare will produce job opportunities previously unavailable.
- ObamaCare would improve America's world health ranking.
Also, please take into account that my opponent did not use many sources nor did he submit a round 3 argument.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Double_R 4 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||7|
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.