The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
0 Points

Should Police Officer be Required to Wear Body Cameras?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/14/2015 Category: News
Updated: 10 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 419 times Debate No: 83921
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)




You tell me why they should be!


I accept the debate, and will argue on why police officers should be required to wear body cameras.
Debate Round No. 1


1. It will be a benefit to the society.


I apologize to my opponent because of not responding real quickly. I've been busy, but will definately argue on why police officers should be required to wear body cameras.

C1. Won't Create as Much Controversy
Ever since the whole Ferguson shooting, there has been a doubt of trust with Police Officers. It is truly sad where the ones who are designed to protect the innocent are being treated like the enemy. I agree at times there are a few bad apples of officers, but a majority of them are just doing their job; siilar to a man or woman doing their work at an office. Both groups do their job in order to survive in society. With a Police Body Camera, it will create less controversy between the officer and citizen.

Has this been proven? It has, because according to source (1), there has been five incidents on how police body cameras benefitted society. As it is seen, it has helped society in may ways.

C2. Rebuttal
In this round of the debate, my opponent argues that without Police Body Cameras; it will "benefit" society. I ask my opponent 'How"? He or she doesn't even provide any evidence or further expands on how it will benefit society. To rebuttal this, there has been multiple incidents of many benefits with allowing Police Body Cameras (2).

Debate Round No. 2


Vane01 forfeited this round.


Vote Pro!
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by boo69 9 months ago
Posted by PowerPikachu21 10 months ago
... I don't get Con's round 2 point. Isn't that what Pro would say? Also, is he saying wearing a camera helps society (which is a concession) , or is he saying NOT wearing a camera helps society, in which case he needs to explain himself.
Posted by snkcake666 10 months ago
I shall subscribe to this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.