Should Roosh V. and the ROT league be banned from entering America?
Debate Rounds (3)
Do we not have freedom of speech? Suppressing someone simply because they want to promote their own group is very tacky, in a manner reminiscent of the stereotypical perception of tumblr.
The ROT League honestly believes something, and are preaching it. Banning them for being up front with their intentions to preach something to a group of people that specifically came over to listen to them is essentially saying that only your opinions matter. Spoiler: They don't. At all.
Now, on to more important matters:
I need to head to my cushy office job at Sexist Cooper Advertising. I think I might get the promotion I put in for this week.
I'm not some stupid girl from tumblr. I am a girl who wants the best for our country and the world.
Roosh is preaching male supremacy. Personally, I also believe in the group I'm in pushing for supremacy at the expense of everyone else, because at the end of the day, it's a zero-sum equation, and the only way to win is to grab as much of the metaphorical pie as possible. If that means other groups will suffer, good. Their suffering will cause them to turn on themselves to scrabble for the remainder and we can crush them at our leisure.
The way I see it, we're two opposing philosophies.
You preach cooperation with other people.
I preach subjugation of other people.
Guess what philosophy will hold more weight when negotiations break down.
I don't see how anyone could possibly want to offend a whole group of people. It will only start fights. It'll only end up a lose-lose situation. Nobody will win.
Also, men already have the power. Women, especially gay and bisexual women, are oppressed everyday by hateful, white, cisgender straight men. We need equal pay. We need to stop being hyper-sexualized and asexualized by the media. We need everyone to know that we're strong and beautiful individuals who can accomplish anything. We can be doctors, actresses, CEOs, all while raising kids at the same time, if that's what we'd like. Most of all, we need people to stop hating us.
This neo-masculine movement is not just hurtful to women and feminists, but to the general population. So stop and think about what and who you are supporting.
If one group gets power, they have an obligation to take care of those within their group first, and if there's any left over, then they can entertain themselves watching the others scrabble for it.
I am very Darwinistic towards what can effectively be considered everyone who isn't me or my immediate family, yes, I am white (the best race if the handicaps are routinely being dished in the name of "equality" by those too weak to stand up for themselves on their own are any indication), I am too asexual to get any relationship-related angst, and I identify as a nigh-superhuman in a full-body suit and a gas mask.
However, I face persecution for being "too militaristic" and am treated as a troll when I advocate exterminating those who stand against us... or are eating resources we could have used.
The Neo-masculine movement, while supporting the glorious patriarchy, is an excellent example of an outlyer group, and by that alone, should be WELCOMED into America. They'd fit right in next to the neo-feminists, and we could see the whole thing unfold on pay-per-view if we locked both groups into the same room. I'd watch it.
Surprise! This representative of the patriarchy wasn't a cigar-chomping 60 year-old in a wrinkled suit who sleeps atop a pile of money, but some Mussolini fanboy with zero regard for human rights, or any rights at all, for that matter.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.