The Instigator
Ruben_Sanda.Pen
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
BIDOOFisBEAST
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Should There be Clinical Diagnosis of Certain Mental Illnesses.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/15/2011 Category: Health
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 826 times Debate No: 18804
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

Ruben_Sanda.Pen

Pro

Should the diagnosis of less dangerous and less affecting disorders, such as Schizotypal Personality Disorder, Psychopathy and other mental illness witch you are born with exist?
I believe it should stay even though everyone is different, since some people can find help in getting diagnosed. The understanding of such disease is different from one individual to an other and the social idea of these are most likely wrong. Though they may be wrong, most are results of research and cannot be mindlessly discarded.
They can help such individuals to find understanding with whom they are and change their behavior positively if they wish to do so.
Some people are different to a point were it can make them struggle with life, and understanding how their minds works is the real therapy if they need healing.
BIDOOFisBEAST

Con

The only mental disoder that needs to be added is, dislike for pokemon and dislike for Bidoof. I see people who don't like Pokemon or Bidoof in school all the time so this needs to be looked at.
Debate Round No. 1
Ruben_Sanda.Pen

Pro

Ruben_Sanda.Pen forfeited this round.
BIDOOFisBEAST

Con

BIDOOFisBEAST forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Ruben_Sanda.Pen

Pro

Ruben_Sanda.Pen forfeited this round.
BIDOOFisBEAST

Con

BIDOOFisBEAST forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Loserboi 5 years ago
Loserboi
LOLOLOLOLOL lolololol
Posted by Spaztoid 5 years ago
Spaztoid
Wrong witch. It's which you are born with, not witch you are born with.
Posted by InfraRedEd 5 years ago
InfraRedEd
It's "who they are," not "whom they are."
Posted by socialpinko 5 years ago
socialpinko
What exactly are you arguing for?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
Ruben_Sanda.PenBIDOOFisBEASTTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to pro since con trolled the debate. Argiments to pro since con's arguments were off subject.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
Ruben_Sanda.PenBIDOOFisBEASTTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: FAIL DEBATE, as both sides dropped out... (checking the voting period debates, from Least To Most votes. By giving this one, it won't be prioritized in the system anymore.)