The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

Should U.N. keep on sending to north Korea?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/5/2010 Category: Politics
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 734 times Debate No: 12695
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (1)




U.N. has enough reasons to sanction north Korea but what about people in north Korea? In North Korea only 1 out of 3 is provided and in that case what about the rest of the people? we shouldn't sanction north Korea because of the nuclear weapons they have. Its just that north Korea has bad leader doesn't mean innocent people must get punishment from other countries.


As I am still waiting for my opponent to answer my question in the comment section, I will give him the benefit of the doubt and postpone my initial argument so that he will have a chance to restate his contention as he indicated a desire to do so.
Debate Round No. 1


WTF, are you talking about?
you didn't ask any question!
Get the fact straight.
OH whats wrong with this kid.



Apparently my opponent is unable to read as well understand the subtleties of the question mark. I asked you if you would like to reword your argument from round 1 for use in round 2, whereby we could have a 2 round debate. It seems now we could still have a 1 round debate, though this is assuming you manage to improve your comprehension skills which is rather unlikely, eh?

Either way I'll be posting my argument in round 3, so I can at least attempt to debate you in some manner.
Debate Round No. 2


kevin1110 forfeited this round.


Tiresias forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by kevin1110 6 years ago
Get outta here you didn't ask me any question.
ok fine what kind of question did you ask ?
Posted by Tiresias 6 years ago
There was supposed to be the word "argument" between your and in on line 3.

Guess it's contagious.
Posted by Tiresias 6 years ago
I wanted to debate "Should U.N. keep on sending to North Korea"....

It had an interesting title, but now we're at a crossroads...

Debate or not to debate. You can repost your in round 2 eh? Make it an old "two rounder".
Posted by kevin1110 6 years ago
I made a New one that is fixed. By the way, why did you join in my debate topic? and right now your not writting anything! I've could've just canceled this debate. was talking to tiresias. just make sure that nobody get confused what i am sayin. your pathetic decision- maker.
Posted by kevin1110 6 years ago
yeah I kinda got that. I saw my debate line story after I published. so yeah.
Posted by burningpuppies101 6 years ago
hey panda!

um... hey kevin? some suggestions:

longer argumentation
argumentation in general.
Posted by I-am-a-panda 6 years ago
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro refused to be involved.