First thing: There are no laws about saying the pledge. You can choose not to, or leave out parts. So, the governments not forcing you to say anything religious, therefore is not violating the First Amendment. If just putting it in the pledge is in anyway breaking the First Amendment, than the entire pledge is. The entire pledge is pro-American. Is making it pro-American making you forfeit you freedom of speech to support any country? As for the seperation of church and state, you have the entire idea wrong. The church is not an idea of God. It's a group of people. Sepreration of church and state stops the church from directly affecting the government. The words "Under God", and even "In God We Trust", aren't in anyway related to giving powereto the church to make legislative decisions. My main reason for keeping it is this: Controversy. The government would get way too much crap for this, and it's not bad for it to be in the pledge. God bless you.
It is true that that there is no law about no saying the pledge, but it's forced socially. Teachers force you to do it most of the time, but this is beside the point. From the 1800s to the 1950s, we had a pledge with out "under god" before it was put in. My question is: Why? Why did we add two words into the pledge that seem to do nothing other than to alienate non-Christians? These words in the pledge serve no purpose. Before you say that the pledge is not specific about what god it's referencing, it's obviously referencing the Christian god. If "under god" was originally in the pledge, I wouldn't mind it being there. If "under god" added something patriotic to the pledge other than propping up one religion over another, I wouldn't mind it being there. But since it was added in, serves no purpose, and offends, it is clear that it needs to go.
But since it was added in, serves no purpose, and offends, it is clear that it needs to go". I fail to see how because it was added in is a reason for the words to be taken out. We add lots of stuff to government. Should it all be taken out? Of course not! As for serving no purpose, neither does the pledge, really. It's definitely not a binding oath. And taking it out would offend some people. I'll bet it would offend more people than leaving it in does (regardless of if they have solid grounds to be offended by it). Effectively, what would happen if we took it out would be more controversy and offense. God bless you.
My opponent seems to think I want everything added by government removed. This is wrong on so many levels. Not everything added by government is bad, but there are somethings that deserve to be removed. "Under God" is one of those things. Why do you think I would like to remove "Under God" from the pledge? A surprising number of people would answer this question: "...because you're an Atheist and when ever you hear the word "god" you soil yourself and cry." This is far from my reason why. You see, it is NOT okay for the government to put one set of beliefs above another. What if the government had put in "Under Allah" instead of "Under God" in the 50s? Would you still support the idea that the pledge should stay. We don't just have freedom of religion, we also have freedom from religion. Freedom from the establishment forcing their beliefs in a public funded environment. I believe I have made my point very clear.
I never said you want all government taken out. I was just using all of government as an example for my point. And you seem to not know the First Amendment. The government is not forcing you to do or say ANYTHING. There is no way anyone can claim their freedom of religion is broken with the pledge. You use a common response that I never made. You yourself said those words were offensive. You have yet to rebut my points, you just restated previous points I had already rebutted. So, recap: There is no violation of freedom of (or from) religion, it would be offensive to a large (probably bigger) number of people to take it out, and it should be kept in. God bless you.
If the government had put "Under Allah" instead of "Under God" I would simply not say that part of the pledge. You have yet to rebut these points: 1.There is no violation of freedom of (or from) religion, and2 it would be offensive to a large (probably bigger) number of people to take it out. I take it you think they are valid , then. So, we should keep the words "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. God bless you.
Reasons for voting decision: This was actually kind of hard to vote on. Pro's major argument was that there is no reason to add in the words "under God" and that it alienates non-Christians. Con had the argument that no one is obligated to say the pledge. However, Pro won it with his points that the government is not allowed to show favoritism towards one religion over an other, even if they aren't necessarily forcing anything on anyone.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.