The Instigator
Univerous
Pro (for)
Losing
7 Points
The Contender
KingDebater
Con (against)
Winning
17 Points

Should Univerous allow non-premium members to sell limiteds?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
KingDebater
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/5/2013 Category: Technology
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,298 times Debate No: 32140
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

Univerous

Pro

Should non-premium users be able to sell limiteds? If we get more then 50 users opinion the rule will change, alt voting will not be tolerated.
KingDebater

Con

I say that Univerous should not allow non-premium members to sell limiteds, because the ability to sell limiteds is something that is desirable. A company like Univerous need to have desirable things for members because if they didn't, they wouldn't get any money. That's how life works. We'd all like free money, but that would mean someone getting ripped off.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Subutai 4 years ago
Subutai
UniverousKingDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Stop it qopel.
Vote Placed by qopel 4 years ago
qopel
UniverousKingDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: CVB
Vote Placed by yuiru 4 years ago
yuiru
UniverousKingDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: dumbbb 1 roundeer
Vote Placed by 1Devilsadvocate 4 years ago
1Devilsadvocate
UniverousKingDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: 1 round is not a debate.
Vote Placed by Misterscruffles 4 years ago
Misterscruffles
UniverousKingDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro asserted his position with a question, but provided no arguments in favor of it.