The Instigator
TheGamer1998
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
danielawesome12
Con (against)
Winning
16 Points

Should WWE Be Banned

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
danielawesome12
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/2/2013 Category: Sports
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,814 times Debate No: 33217
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

TheGamer1998

Pro

Round one is for the acceptance of this debate
danielawesome12

Con

I accept, hoping you mean World Wrestling Entertainment.
Debate Round No. 1
TheGamer1998

Pro

That's exactly what I mean, I say it should be banned because the fighters are paid to beat each other up and act like they hate each other
danielawesome12

Con

1. In WWE fighters are rarely injured, plus they agree to fight for millions of dollars.(they fake injuries to go on vacations)

2. Its fake

http://answers.yahoo.com...
http://bleacherreport.com...
3. Americans should have the right to own businesses, and that's all the WWE is.
Debate Round No. 2
TheGamer1998

Pro

It may be fake but that's not what some little kids think, some kids think it's completely real and try to pull off the same moves as the wrestlers in the show, my father and oldest brother being two of them -.-
danielawesome12

Con

Most kids have parents who normally--> 1. who won't let them watch WWE 2. Tell them it's fake 3. Make sure they don't Batista Bomb anybody, nice way to completely change your arguement. WWE is a buisness and I believe in Free Enterprise.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by TheGamer1998 4 years ago
TheGamer1998
All of them >:3
Posted by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
Banned from what? And it's best to specify exactly which WWE you are referring to.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by johnlubba 4 years ago
johnlubba
TheGamer1998danielawesome12Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Weak arguments but con won by claiming a fake industry is harmless, Pro, used the fact that children copy the moves to convince us how bad wrestling is and the influence it can have, but con showed that under the proper parental supervision, this should not be a problem.
Vote Placed by wolfman4711 4 years ago
wolfman4711
TheGamer1998danielawesome12Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Should all fighting be banned?
Vote Placed by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
TheGamer1998danielawesome12Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Sources were too weak to count. Arguments were weak as well, but pro never attempted to meet BoP; the personal touch was not bad, but without outside cases of injuries it did not hold up.
Vote Placed by GeekiTheGreat 4 years ago
GeekiTheGreat
TheGamer1998danielawesome12Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Cause GAWD thats why