The Instigator
Tamison
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TwistingStorm
Pro (for)
Winning
8 Points

Should We Join Forces With China?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
TwistingStorm
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/2/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 398 times Debate No: 74678
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

Tamison

Con

Should we join forces with China?
Will it help our Economy?
Will it get America out of debt?
What do you think?
TwistingStorm

Pro

I firmly believe that we should join forces with China. China has one of the biggest economies on the planet. The exchange rate of China is 1.86 trillion. Not only economically would be greater but military wise we would be a force to be reckoned with. China has 2,285,000 million soldiers and added to our own 1,492,000 soldiers would equal 3,777,000 soldiers in total. Plus we could help China with its population problems with our own expert environmental protection agency.
Debate Round No. 1
Tamison

Con

Tamison forfeited this round.
TwistingStorm

Pro

First off I would like to clarify I meant pollution and not population in my last argument.

China could benefit from our educational system. Then China's population would have its restrictions on internet lifted and would increase their knowledge.
Debate Round No. 2
Tamison

Con

Tamison forfeited this round.
TwistingStorm

Pro

In conclusion I believe that we would benefit in many ways if we joined China. In education, military, and economics.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Russia_The_almighty 2 years ago
Russia_The_almighty
TamisonTwistingStormTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited and really provided no arguments. Pro had some very good points such as solving Chinese pollution problems.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
TamisonTwistingStormTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture