The Instigator
mrmrlol
Con (against)
Winning
20 Points
The Contender
Mr.Wright
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

Should You be able to buy virtual cash with real money?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/9/2010 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,067 times Debate No: 11692
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (22)
Votes (7)

 

mrmrlol

Con

This is my first debate, so I'm not used to this. Anyway, People shouldn't be able to buy virtual cash with real money because online games shouldn't be about how much someone has in real life, because It would be unfair. If someone is poor in real life, they shouldn't be penalized in the game.
Definitions:
Virtual cash - Money used in games (e.g. crowns in wizard 101)
Mr.Wright

Pro

OBJECTION!!! (lol) well people should because if they don't the websites can't make money. Posting websites on the internet cost money you know. besides we should repay them for the fun they give us.
Debate Round No. 1
mrmrlol

Con

Actually, funds such as membership and advertisement should suffice. Besides, many items are only available with these currencies, such as crowns in wizard 101 are the only way to get exclusive items, such as houses and minions. In free realms, thats the only way to get a certain pets. That is unfair to poorer players.
Mr.Wright

Pro

like I said before you need money to post it on the internet. And if people are poor it's because they need a job. And if your Myth school in Wizard101 you can get minions. And on Roblox you get free tickets. And don't forget Everything needs money. (food, games , house e.t.c.) .....errrr.... that's all
Debate Round No. 2
mrmrlol

Con

First of all, membership and advertisement should suffice. Second of all, not all minions are free in wizard 101. Tickets are free, but that is irrelevant, this debate is about if virtual cash, such as crowns, should be free. As for living costs... heres where I win. With all these living costs, many can't afford to purchase game currency.
Mr.Wright

Pro

well first of all the economy is bad so most people don't have lots of money but besides if the website makes no money there going to shutdown other words if you don't pay them they're be gone. most of the websites only allow to only pay 5$ anyway that's very little money. remember people who are poor just don't work as hard as other people do. And the creators' of the website spent weeks working on it so they deserve the money they make after all besides they upgrading as we speak. ......yeah that's all.... I might lose because some people might be cheap.....
Debate Round No. 3
22 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Mr.Wright 7 years ago
Mr.Wright
errrrrrr 17-0 wow I'm losing bigtime
Posted by mrmrlol 7 years ago
mrmrlol
Oh. Sorry. I won't do it again.
Posted by Korashk 7 years ago
Korashk
mrmrlol, this is your first debate so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. What you did with your vote is called vote abuse or vote bombing. Awarding points without justifying your answers when it is not obvious that those points should be rewarded is very bad conduct and will likely cause more than a little disdain to be directed towards you if you if you do it regularly.
Posted by mrmrlol 7 years ago
mrmrlol
What he meant was a lot of time. I know him irl and he has no sense of time.
Posted by xxdarkxx 7 years ago
xxdarkxx
mr. wright said:
"And the creators' of the website spent weeks working on it"
ummmm if you seriously think they only spent weeks working on it then you really dont deserve to use the internet.... you probably just think that its a really big truck anyways
Posted by mrmrlol 7 years ago
mrmrlol
Infam0us, no. I would lose. I realized just know about 500 things Mr.Wright could of said to win.
Posted by mrmrlol 7 years ago
mrmrlol
Koopin, its both of our first debates so they're not that good
Posted by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
I'd love to be PRO in a debate like this.
Posted by Koopin 7 years ago
Koopin
Both could have done 10 times better.
Posted by infam0us 7 years ago
infam0us
con, please challenge me to the same debate? :)
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by philosphical 7 years ago
philosphical
mrmrlolMr.WrightTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Vigrant 7 years ago
Vigrant
mrmrlolMr.WrightTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Vote Placed by xxdarkxx 7 years ago
xxdarkxx
mrmrlolMr.WrightTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Vote Placed by Koopin 7 years ago
Koopin
mrmrlolMr.WrightTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Vote Placed by Awed 7 years ago
Awed
mrmrlolMr.WrightTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Vote Placed by mrmrlol 7 years ago
mrmrlol
mrmrlolMr.WrightTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Korashk 7 years ago
Korashk
mrmrlolMr.WrightTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10