The Instigator
Ckexno
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
sidewinder
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

Should a nuke have been dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima instead of a land invasion?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/9/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 231 times Debate No: 77469
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

Ckexno

Con

I will take the position of being against the decision to bomb both Japanese cities. We are talking a full land invasion of the Japanese mainland. First round is acceptance.
sidewinder

Pro

I accept and will be arguing that the nuclear bombing of Japan was a better decisions than invading Japan
Debate Round No. 1
Ckexno

Con

Ckexno forfeited this round.
sidewinder

Pro

sidewinder forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Ckexno

Con

Ckexno forfeited this round.
sidewinder

Pro

sidewinder forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Ckexno

Con

Ckexno forfeited this round.
sidewinder

Pro

sidewinder forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.