Should abortion be limited?
Debate Rounds (3)
1) make a realistic argument
2) be respectful
Do you accept the challenge?
I believe that abortion should be limited, because in many cases, it's unnecessary and just convenient for the mother.
I say this because: many of the times the mother is just using it because she doesn't want a kid, or because she's a teenager. I think this is wrong because, if you don't want a kid you can always put it up for adoption, and if you feel you're to irresponsible to have a kid, then that's just too bad. You don't have the right to kill your baby just because it's an obstacle. If you were old enough to consent to sex, you're old enough to care for a child. And, as I stated before, there's always adoption.
Speaking of consenting, if you were raped then I believe you have every right to an abortion, because something that's not your fault is not your responsibility. This is one of the cases when I'm for abortion.
So, in short, I believe the only cases when abortion should be considered 100% acceptable are: rape, incest, threat to mother's health.
I believe that abortion should limited in cases of teenage or unwanted pregnancy, especially the ladies who sleep around and use abortion as a contraceptive.
I'm impartial on children being born into poverty, because : I'm sure that condoms or birth control pills would have costed less than an abortion. And again, there's always adoption and very often there are safe havens available where you can drop your baby off, no questions asked.
To start off, I would like to analyze your first point.
"I think this is wrong because, if you don't want a kid you can always put it up for adoption, and if you feel you're to irresponsible to have a kid, then that's just too bad. You don't have the right to kill your baby just because it's an obstacle. If you were old enough to consent to sex, you're old enough to care for a child. And, as I stated before, there's always adoption."
First of all, adoption is not the best option. In 2011, 11 percent of the children (over 26,000) exiting foster care aged out of the system. Research has shown that teens aging out of the system are highly likely as adults to experience homelessness, poor health, unemployment, incarceration, and other poor outcomes.  This has a negative effect on the child, as adoption is not always the best outcome. There are some terrifying cases, but since they may be viewed as isolated cases, I will not present them unless asked by my opponent.
Secondly, the Supreme Court decision in Roe V. Wade made it possible for a woman to have an abortion. Before the supreme court decision, many women were performing illegal abortions all because they could not have a legal one. Studies show that prior to Roe V. Wade they were many unwanted pregnancies in America. According to The New York Daily News article entitled "Do People agree with Abortion" a large amount of people, 89%, agree that the government should not put limits on abortions. When abortions were illegal, number of deaths was 8 times greater than death rate from legal abortions.  This is a staggering amount that was unnecessary. Limiting abortions could have the same effect, as women would need to find another way to abort the baby if doctors would be unable to do it for them. My opponents argument was women who would be in danger could have an abortion. However, having the mother abort the baby herself would also put the mother in great danger. Subsequently, this negates my opponents point, as limiting abortions could put women at an even greater risk.
"You don't have the right to kill your baby just because it's an obstacle."
I would like to negate the point that you are calling it a baby. According to the Medical Dictionary, a fetus is the developing young in the uterus, specifically the unborn offspring in the postembryonic period, in humans from nine weeks after fertilization until birth. A baby is an infant. Taking it into account that it is a fetus and not a baby, it is found that a fetus does not feel consciousness because it does not have any high brain activity or self-awareness. Even the presence of a heartbeat and the presence of primitive neural activity does not imply that the embryo is significantly conscious.  What is needed to define something as a baby is a developed nervous system with higher brain activity. For this reason, it should not matter for what reasons or why the mother chooses to get the fetus aborted, as it does not matter since it is just generally a sperm and an egg.
In addition, the woman decides to have the baby. The choice and right to have a possibility to bring a child in this world should be the same right to abort it. The government should have no right into saying who can have an abortion and under what circumstances. Since it is the persons own body, they should do whatever they feel is right. Adoption is an option, and pregnant women should be educated on different futures besides just abortion. However, women have the right to have a choice, no matter the reason or the circumstances that led them to become pregnant. All I would say to a person who believe in pro- life is you do not have an abortion. However, your decision should not effect others. Since I am not in that situation, I should not have the right to say what I would do or what we shouldn't do on personal preference. The only people who understand are at that point, and they have the right to choose for themselves.
kkloviee forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by TH3Antag0nist 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||6|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had a good start, but Con ultimately did better.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.