The Instigator
hd1997
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
CheeseFries
Pro (for)
Winning
16 Points

Should animals be put in microwaves

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
CheeseFries
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/26/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 678 times Debate No: 49975
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (8)
Votes (4)

 

hd1997

Con

I say that animals should not be put in microwaves
CheeseFries

Pro

Yes, animals should be put in microwaves.
Now how long would you like me to cook you for?
Debate Round No. 1
hd1997

Con

I mean like cats and dogs should not be put in the microwave
CheeseFries

Pro

First and foremost, I apologize to anyone who took offense to my joke. I did not realize this was a serious debate.

Since it IS serious, I will debate that animals should be put in a microwave. Con has lacked to specify what kinds of animals she has in mind in the title and her opening arguments. Due to open interpretation, I will define "animals" as the following- commonly consumed animals such as chicken, pork, or beef.

With that settled, these types of animals should be put in microwaves, for the sake of safe and proper consumption. If these foods are not heated up, then various illnesses such as salmonella or worms could be contracted. Even with other methods such as baking or grilling, microwaving is the most quick and efficient way to cook animals.
Debate Round No. 2
hd1997

Con

what animals i was thinking is that cat and dogs should not go in to the microwave
CheeseFries

Pro

My argument stands. Con does not offer any points to argue or give rebuttals for.

Good luck in the voting stage!
Debate Round No. 3
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by filthymexican 3 years ago
filthymexican
Con is a fool. I think he tried to actually argue his point but honestly, that was the worst excuse for an argument i think i have ever seen. I think i may as well go and put my dog in the microwave. Con, because of you I have lost all faith in humanity.
Posted by Juris 3 years ago
Juris
Lol! Hahaha.
Posted by hd1997 3 years ago
hd1997
you sir are a very mean person they have a place for you it is hell. Elementninja can go to hell
Posted by Elementninja 3 years ago
Elementninja
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssssssss... that would be hilarious!!!!!!!!! x2+2x777777777777777777777
Posted by hd1997 3 years ago
hd1997
i mean cats and dogs
Posted by DTSmember 3 years ago
DTSmember
Oh my. They should have clarified which type of animal.
Posted by Benshapiro 3 years ago
Benshapiro
Technically any kind of meat is from an animal and could be microwaved to ensure that it isn't raw or cold.
Posted by Jabuticaba 3 years ago
Jabuticaba
Don't be mean pro. I am already hoping you lose points for conduct.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
hd1997CheeseFriesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: con epically failed.
Vote Placed by Relativist 3 years ago
Relativist
hd1997CheeseFriesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con failed to properly state his stance in R1 and confused Pro. This + unrefuted arguments clearly shows pro wins.
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
hd1997CheeseFriesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was never refuted.
Vote Placed by iamanatheistandthisiswhy 3 years ago
iamanatheistandthisiswhy
hd1997CheeseFriesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con, while I understand your position. The proposition was vague and Pro is correct in their assertion that it is beneficial to cook chicken, pork, beef etc. Argument points to Pro. BTW, this debate made me laugh for all the wrong reasons.